Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31808532›Full record

ReviewPain medicine (Malden, Mass.)2019

An Algorithmic Approach to Treating Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: An Evidenced-Based Approach.

Sudhir Diwan, Dawood Sayed, Timothy R Deer, Amber Salomons, Kevin Liang

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The Added Value and the Efficacy of Preoperative Physiotherapy on Degenerative Diseases of the Lumbar Spine: A Systematic Review.Physiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Intervertebral disc degeneration.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Evolving Role of Lumbar Decompression: A Narrative Review.International journal of spine surgery · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Case-matched radiological and clinical outcome evaluation of interlaminar versus microsurgical decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2023
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sudhir DiwanAdvanced Spine on Park Avenue, New York, NY 10022.
Dawood SayedUniversity of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas.
Timothy R DeerThe Center for Pain Relief, Spine and Nerve Centers of the Virginias, Charleston, West Virginia, USA.
Amber SalomonsFactory CRO, Bilthoven, the Netherlands.
Kevin LiangMilestone Research Organization, San Diego, California, USA.
Albert Einstein College of Medicine · USThe Spine & Nerve Centers of the Virginias · USUniversity of Kansas Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveLumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) can lead to compression of the neural and vascular elements and is becoming more common due to degenerative changes that occur because of aging processes. Symptoms may manifest as pain and discomfort that radiates to the lower leg, thigh, and/or buttocks. The traditional treatment algorithm for LSS consists of conservative management (physical therapy, medication, education, exercise), often followed by epidural steroid injections (ESIs), and when nonsurgical treatment has failed, open decompression surgery with or without fusion is considered. In this review, the variables that should be considered during the management of patients with LSS are discussed, and the role of each treatment option to provide optimal care is evaluated.

resultsThis review leads to the creation of an evidence-based practical algorithm to aid clinicians in the management of patients with LSS. Special emphasis is directed at minimally invasive surgery, which should be taken into consideration when conservative management and ESI have failed.

Indexed as

Decompression, SurgicalHumansLumbar VertebraeMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresPainPhysical Therapy ModalitiesSpinal StenosisAlgorithmic ApproachEpidural Steroid InjectionInterspinous Lumbar DecompressionLumbar Spinal StenosisMinimally InvasiveNonsurgical Treatment

Identifiers

PMID31808532
PMCPMC7101167
OpenAlexW2997809779

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.