Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31808327›Full record

ReviewJournal of biomedical optics2019

Review of clinical trials in intraoperative molecular imaging during cancer surgery.

John Y K Lee, Steve S Cho, Walter Stummer, Janos L Tanyi, Alexander L Vahrmeijer, Eben Rosenthal, Barbara Smith, Eric Henderson, David W Roberts, Amy Lee and 4 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of biomedical optics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

John Y K LeeUniversity of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States.
Steve S ChoUniversity of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States.
Walter StummerUniversity of Münster, Münster, Germany.
Janos L TanyiUniversity of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States.
Alexander L VahrmeijerLeiden University, Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Eben RosenthalStanford University, School of Medicine, California, United States.
Barbara SmithHarvard University, School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
Eric HendersonDartmouth College, School of Medicine, Hanover, New Hampshire, United States.
David W RobertsDartmouth College, School of Medicine, Hanover, New Hampshire, United States.
Amy LeeUniversity of Washington, School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, United States.
Constantinos G HadjipanayisIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, United States.
Jeffrey N BruceColumbia University, School of Medicine, New York, United States.
Jason G NewmanUniversity of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States.
Sunil SinghalUniversity of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States.

Funding

Coregistered Fluorescence-Enhanced Resection of Malignant GliomaR01NS052274 · NINDS · DARTMOUTH-HITCHCOCK CLINIC · PI ROBERTS, DAVID W · 2007 to 2018
$4.6M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS052274
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most solid cancers are treated by surgical resections to reduce the burden of disease. Surgeons often face the challenge of detecting small areas of residual neoplasm after resection or finding small primary tumors for the initial resection. Intraoperative molecular imaging (IMI) is an emerging technology with the potential to dramatically improve cancer surgery operations by allowing surgeons to better visualize areas of neoplasm using fluorescence imaging. Over the last two years, two molecular optical contrast agents received U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval, and several more drugs are now on the horizon. Thus a conference was organized at the University of Pennsylvania to bring together oncologic surgeons from different specialties to discuss the current clinical status of IMI trials with a specific focus on phase 2 and phase 3 studies. In addition, phase 1 and experimental trials were also discussed briefly, to highlight other novel techniques. Our review summarizes the discussions from the conference and delves into the types of cancers discussed, different contrast agents in human trials, and the clinical value being studied.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsClinical Trials as TopicHumansMolecular ImagingOptical ImagingSurgery, Computer-Assistedfluorescence-guided surgeryintraoperative visualizationmolecular imagingtumor surgery

Identifiers

PMID31808327
PMCPMC7005471

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.