Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31808102›Full record

ArticleDemography2019

The Impact of the Flint Water Crisis on Fertility.

Daniel S Grossman, David J G Slusky

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Demography, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
13.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 78 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Drinking Water Contaminant Concentrations and Birth Outcomes.Journal of policy analysis and management : [the journal of the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management] · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Drinking water, fracking, and infant health.Journal of health economics · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Daniel S GrossmanDepartment of Economics, West Virginia University, 1601 University Avenue, 411 College of Business and Economics, Morgantown, WV, 26506-6025, USA. daniel.grossman@mail.wvu.edu.
David J G SluskyDepartment of Economics, University of Kansas, 1460 Jayhawk Boulevard, 415 Snow Hall, Lawrence, KS, 66045, USA.
University of Kansas · USWest Virginia University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Flint switched its public water source in April 2014, increasing exposure to lead and other contaminants. We compare the change in the fertility rate and in health at birth in Flint before and after the water switch to the changes in other cities in Michigan. We find that Flint fertility rates decreased by 12 % and that overall health at birth decreased. This effect on health at birth is a function of two countervailing mechanisms: (1) negative selection of less healthy embryos and fetuses not surviving (raising the average health of survivors), and (2) those who survived being scarred (decreasing average health). We untangle this to find a net of selection scarring effect of 5.4 % decrease in birth weight. Because of long-term effects of in utero exposure, these effects are likely lower bounds on the overall effects of this exposure.

Indexed as

Health StatusWater SupplyAdolescentAdultBirth RateBirth WeightFemaleFertilityFetal DevelopmentHumansInfant, NewbornLeadMaleMichiganMiddle AgedPregnancyLeadWater Pollutants, ChemicalBirth outcomesEnvironmental regulationFertility rateLeadWomen’s health

Identifiers

PMID31808102
OpenAlexW2994273259

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.