Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31808098›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2020

The effects of co-exposure of graphene oxide and copper under different pH conditions in Manila clam Ruditapes philippinarum.

Roberta Socoowski Britto, Jefferson Patrício Nascimento, Tiago Serode, Adelina P Santos, Amadeu M V M Soares, Etelvina Figueira, Clascídia Furtado, Juliane Lima-Ventura, José M Monserrat, Rosa Freitas

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Special issue on challenges in emerging environmental contaminants CEEC19.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Roberta Socoowski BrittoUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande - FURG, Rio Grande, RS, Brazil.
Jefferson Patrício NascimentoCentro de Desenvolvimento da Tecnologia Nuclear, CDTN, Minas Gerais, MG, Brazil.
Tiago SerodeCentro de Desenvolvimento da Tecnologia Nuclear, CDTN, Minas Gerais, MG, Brazil.
Adelina P SantosCentro de Desenvolvimento da Tecnologia Nuclear, CDTN, Minas Gerais, MG, Brazil.
Amadeu M V M SoaresDepartamento de Biologia & CESAM, Universidade de Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal.
Etelvina FigueiraDepartamento de Biologia & CESAM, Universidade de Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal.
Clascídia FurtadoCentro de Desenvolvimento da Tecnologia Nuclear, CDTN, Minas Gerais, MG, Brazil.
Juliane Lima-VenturaUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande - FURG, Rio Grande, RS, Brazil.
José M MonserratUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande - FURG, Rio Grande, RS, Brazil. monserrat_jm@furg.br.
Rosa FreitasDepartamento de Biologia & CESAM, Universidade de Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal. rosafreitas@ua.pt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4900-3897

Funding

CNPQ PQ 308539/2016-8CYTED Ciencia y Tecnología para el Desarrollo 419RT0578Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia POCI-01-0145-FEDER-028425
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Carbon nanomaterials (CNM), such as graphene oxide (GO), have been the focus of study in several areas of science mostly due to their physical-chemical properties. However, data concerning the potential toxic effects of these CNM in bivalves are still scarce. When present in the aquatic systems, the combination with other contaminants, as well as pH environmental variations, can influence the behavior of these nanomaterials and, consequently, their toxicity. Thus, the main goal of this study was to evaluate the effect of exposure of clam Ruditapes philippinarum to GO when acting alone and in the combination with copper (Cu), under two pH levels (control 7.8 and 7.3). A 28-day exposure was performed and metabolism and oxidative stress-related parameters were evaluated. The effects caused by GO and Cu exposures, either isolated or co-exposed, showed a direct and dependent relationship with the pH in which the organisms were exposed. In clams maintained at control pH (7.8), Cu and GO + Cu treatments showed lower lipid peroxidation (LPO) and lower electron transport system (ETS) activity, respectively. In clams maintained at low pH, glutathione-S-transferases (GSTs) activities were increased in Cu and Cu + GO treatments, whereas reduced glutathione (GSH) levels were increased in Cu treatment and ETS activity was higher in GO + Cu. Thus, it can be observed that clams responses to Cu and GO were strongly modulated by pH in terms of their defense system and energy production, although this does not result into higher LPO levels.

Indexed as

BivalviaAnimalsCopperGraphiteHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationWater Pollutants, ChemicalCoppergraphene oxideGraphiteWater Pollutants, ChemicalAcidificationAquatic environmentCopperNanotoxicologyOxidative stress

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.