Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31808044›Full record

ReviewReviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders2020

Definition and diagnosis of aggressive pituitary tumors.

Leandro Kasuki, Gérald Raverot

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Can acromegaly be controlled in all cases?Journal of neuroendocrinology · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. MicroRNA Is Downregulated in Invasive Non-Functioning Pituitary Adenomas.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. scRNA sequencing technology for PitNET studies.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2024
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. The expression ofFrontiers in endocrinology · 2024
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Leandro KasukiNeuroendocrinology Research Center/ Endocrinology Division - Medical School and Hospital Universitário Clementino Fraga Filho, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Gérald Raverot"Groupement Hospitalier Est" Hospices Civils de Lyon, Endocrinology Department, Reference Center for Rare Pituitary Diseases HYPO, 59 Pinel Boulevard, 69677, Bron, France. gerald.raverot@chu-lyon.fr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pituitary adenomas are considered benign tumors, but approximately 10% of them can have an aggressive behavior and more rarely (0.2%) can present metastasis, being classified as pituitary carcinomas. Aggressive adenomas are generally large and invasive tumors that present unusually rapid growth and/or that grow irrespective of conventional treatment with surgery, medical therapy and radiotherapy. Nevertheless, large tumors, as well as invasive tumors are not always aggressive, with this definition being possible only after clinical follow-up of these tumors, with growth rate and response to therapies being key points to its diagnosis. The correct identification and diagnosis of aggressive adenomas is of great importance as they are associated with great morbidity and increased mortality.

Indexed as

AdenomaCarcinomaNeoplasm InvasivenessPituitary NeoplasmsHumansAggressive tumorsInvasive tumorsPituitary adenomasPituitary carcinoma

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.