Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31808036›Full record

ArticleThe protein journal2020

Heterotropic Modulation of Amylin Fibrillation by Small Molecules: Implications for Formulative Designs.

Celimar Sinézia, Luís Maurício T R Lima

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The protein journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Celimar SinéziaLaboratory for Pharmaceutical Biotechnology - pbiotech, Faculty of Pharmacy, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro - UFRJ CCS, Bss24, Ilha do Fundão, 21941-902, Rio De Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Luís Maurício T R LimaLaboratory for Pharmaceutical Biotechnology - pbiotech, Faculty of Pharmacy, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro - UFRJ CCS, Bss24, Ilha do Fundão, 21941-902, Rio De Janeiro, RJ, Brazil. Mauricio@pharma.ufrj.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6020-0504
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Control of amylin agglomeration is of interest for both the study of pathophysiology and the design of amylin-based pharmaceutical products. Here we report the effects of a large set of common buffering agents, aminoacids and nucleoside phosphates over the amylin amyloid aggregation. Circular dichroism showed no apparent effects of the co-solutes over the secondary-structure of soluble amylin. Instead, we found a large dependence of the fibrillation process on the total amount of co-solute charged groups. The amyloid nature of the aggregates was confirmed by transmission electron microscopy, X-ray diffraction and infrared spectroscopy. While acidic pH and low-ionic co-solutes shows the largest size effect in hampering aggregation, no further effect was observed that could identify a single compound as a major direct heterotropic determinants of the amyloid process. These data suggest a more physico-chemical effect of co-solutes over the modulation of amylin instead of a chemical entity-related causal factor.

Indexed as

Protein Aggregation, PathologicalAmyloidBuffersCircular DichroismDiabetes MellitusHumansHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationIslet Amyloid PolypeptideMicroscopy, Electron, TransmissionProtein Structure, SecondarySpectrophotometry, InfraredX-Ray DiffractionAmyloidBuffersIslet Amyloid PolypeptideAmylinAmyloidDiabetesIslet amyloid polypeptideOligomer

Identifiers

PMID31808036
OpenAlexW2992179292

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.