Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31808025›Full record

ArticleJournal of religion and health2020

Religion and Caregiving for Orphans and Vulnerable Children: A Qualitative Study of Caregivers Across Four Religious Traditions and Five Global Contexts.

David E Eagle, Warren A Kinghorn, Heather Parnell, Cyrilla Amanya, Vanroth Vann, Senti Tzudir, Venkata Gopala Krishna Kaza, Chimdi Temesgen Safu, Kathryn Whetten, Rae Jean Proeschold-Bell

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of religion and health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

David E EagleCenter for Health Policy and Inequalities Research, Duke University, 310 Trent Drive CB 90392, Durham, NC, 27708, USA. david.eagle@duke.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4909-9497
Warren A KinghornDuke University Medical Center and Duke Divinity School, Durham, USA.
Heather ParnellCenter for Health Policy and Inequalities Research, Duke University, 310 Trent Drive CB 90392, Durham, NC, 27708, USA.
Cyrilla AmanyaResearch Department, ACE Africa Kenya, Bungoma, Kenya.
Vanroth VannDevelopment for Cambodian Children, Battambang City, Cambodia.
Senti TzudirSahara Centre for Residential Care & Rehabilitation, Hyderabad, India.
Venkata Gopala Krishna KazaSahara Centre for Residential Care & Rehabilitation, Hyderabad, India.
Chimdi Temesgen SafuStand for Vulnerable Organization (SVO), Addis-Ababa, Ethiopia.
Kathryn WhettenCenter for Health Policy and Inequalities Research, Duke University, 310 Trent Drive CB 90392, Durham, NC, 27708, USA.
Rae Jean Proeschold-BellCenter for Health Policy and Inequalities Research, Duke University, 310 Trent Drive CB 90392, Durham, NC, 27708, USA.

Funding

John Templeton Foundation (US) HappinessJohn Templeton Foundation (US) Well-Being Grants
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studies of caregivers of orphans and vulnerable children (OVC) rarely examine the role religion plays in their lives. We conducted qualitative interviews of 69 caregivers in four countries: Ethiopia, Kenya, Cambodia, and India (Hyderabad and Nagaland), and across four religious traditions: Christian (Orthodox, Roman Catholic, and Protestant), Muslim, Buddhist, and Hindu. We asked respondents to describe the importance of religion for their becoming a caregiver, the way in which religion has helped them make sense of why children are orphans, and how religion helps them face the challenges of their occupation. Using qualitative descriptive analysis, three major themes emerged. Respondents discussed how religion provided a strong motivation for their work, reported that religious institutions were often the way in which they were introduced to caregiving as an occupation, and spoke of the ways religious practices sustain them in their work. They rarely advanced religion as an explanation for why OVC exist-only when pressed did they offer explicitly religious accounts. This study has implications for OVC care, including the importance of engaging religious institutions to support caregivers, the significance of attending to local religious context, and the vital need for research outside of Christian contexts.

Indexed as

ReligionVulnerable PopulationsCaregiversChildChild, OrphanedChristianityCross-Cultural ComparisonHinduismHumansIndiaInterviews as TopicIslamKenyaQualitative ResearchReligion and PsychologyBuddhismCaregiversChristianityHinduismInternationalIslamOrphaned and vulnerable childrenReligionReligion and occupational well-being

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.