Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31808005›Full record

ReviewCurrent gastroenterology reports2019

Controversy in Nutrition Recommendations for Short Bowel Syndrome: How Type of SBS Impacts Response.

Kerstin Austin, Sara Bonnes, Harrison Daniel

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current gastroenterology reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kerstin AustinUniversity of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, 600 Highland Ave., Madison, WI, 53705, USA. kerstinpriest@gmail.com.
Sara BonnesMayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Harrison DanielUniversity of Louisville, Louisville, KY, 40292, USA.
Mayo Clinic · USUniversity of Louisville · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThis review examines the current recommendations for dietary management of patients living with short bowel syndrome (SBS) and outlines the need for future research to provide optimal care for this unique group of patients. RECENT

findingsProviders caring for patients with SBS lack sufficient data to help guide recommendations regarding diet. The majority of studies are conducted at a single medical institution on a small number of anatomically diverse patients. Multi-center studies would allow for inclusion of a larger number of patients and may lead to more individualized dietary recommendations. Patients with short bowel syndrome should be evaluated on an individual basis by a multidisciplinary team including physicians, dieticians, pharmacists, and nurses specializing in the care of these complex patients. Tailoring both medical and nutritional therapy will help realize the overarching goal for these patients of maintaining adequate nutrition with diet and medications, and achieving independence from parenteral support.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalAnastomosis, SurgicalColonFluid TherapyHumansIleumIntestine, SmallJejunostomyJejunumNutrientsNutritional StatusNutrition TherapyPatient Care TeamShort Bowel SyndromeNutrientsNutrition recommendationsParenteral nutritionShort bowel syndrome

Identifiers

PMID31808005
OpenAlexW2991754576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.