Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31807989›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2020

Treatment and recurrence on re-treatment tuberculosis patients: a randomized clinical trial and 7-year perspective cohort study in China.

Jian Du, Le Zhang, Yan Ma, X-Y Chen, Q-P Ge, X-Z Tian, Weiwei Gao, Zhongwei Jia

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jian DuBeijing Chest Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 97 Machang Road, Beijing, 101149, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9561-3541
Le ZhangNational Institute of Drug Dependence, Peking University, 38 Xueyuan Road, Beijing, 100191, People's Republic of China.
Yan MaInstitute Of Basic Research in Clinical Medicine, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
X-Y ChenBeijing Chest Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 97 Machang Road, Beijing, 101149, China.
Q-P GeBeijing Chest Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 97 Machang Road, Beijing, 101149, China.
X-Z TianBeijing Chest Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 97 Machang Road, Beijing, 101149, China.
Weiwei GaoBeijing Chest Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 97 Machang Road, Beijing, 101149, China. gwwjys@sina.com.
Zhongwei JiaNational Institute of Drug Dependence, Peking University, 38 Xueyuan Road, Beijing, 100191, People's Republic of China. urchinjj@163.com.

Funding

National Major Science and Technology Projects of China 2008ZXl0003-015National Natural Science Foundation in China 61571001National Natural Science Foundation in China U1611264National Natural Science Foundation of China 91546203the National Science and Technology 2013ZXl0003009-001-007
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previously treated TB patients still pose a serious threat to global control of TB, yet new re-treatment therapies were little studied. This study aimed to examine the therapeutic effects of new re-treatment regimens, and explore risk factors associated with recurrence after successful treatment. We conducted a cohort study in nine regions of China and enrolled previously treated TB patients from October, 2008 to December, 2010. Patients were randomly divided into four treatment regimen groups including standard, high-dose, long-course, and individualized treatment. After treatment, those with successful treatment outcomes were followed up to 7 years. The effects of different regimens and the information of recurrence were recorded. Risk factors to poor treatment outcomes were calculated using logistic regression model, while risk factors to recurrence or death were calculated using Cox model. Four hundred ninety-two participants were enrolled during the study time and 419 patients were included in our analysis of treatment effects. Overall, the treatment success rate is 75.9%, and the recurrence and death rate is 6.9% and 3.8%, respectively. Reduced risks of poor outcomes were observed in patients who were treated with high-dose and individualized regimen compared with standard regimen, and the adjusted ORs were 0.3 (0.1-0.6), 0.2 (0.1-0.5), respectively. In our analysis of factors associated with recurrence, all documented variables were not significant. Revised re-treatment regimen has better therapeutic effects compared to standard regimen, but it was not associated with lower risk of TB recurrence. Further studies are warranted to evaluate the role of other revised re-treatment regimens in recurrence risk. Trial registration: chictr.org Identifier: ChiCTR1800017441.

Indexed as

AdultAntitubercular AgentsChinaCohort StudiesDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRecurrenceRisk FactorsSputumTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeTuberculosis, Multidrug-ResistantTuberculosis, PulmonaryAntitubercular AgentsRecurrenceRe-treatment regimenRe-treatment TBTherapeutic effects

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.