Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31807982›Full record

ArticleTropical animal health and production2020

More insights about the interfering effect of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis (MAP) infection on Mycobacterium bovis (M. bovis) detection in dairy cattle.

E Raffo, P Steuer, C Tomckowiack, C Tejeda, B Collado, M Salgado

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Tropical animal health and production, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Selection of vaccine-candidate peptides fromFrontiers in immunology · 2024
    Article
  4. Limited usefulness of the ISFrontiers in veterinary science · 2024
    Article
  5. Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

E RaffoInstituto de Medicina Preventiva Veterinaria, Universidad Austral de Chile, Valdivia, Chile.
P SteuerInstituto de Medicina Preventiva Veterinaria, Universidad Austral de Chile, Valdivia, Chile.
C TomckowiackInstituto de Medicina Preventiva Veterinaria, Universidad Austral de Chile, Valdivia, Chile.
C TejedaInstituto de Medicina Preventiva Veterinaria, Universidad Austral de Chile, Valdivia, Chile.
B ColladoInstituto de Medicina Preventiva Veterinaria, Universidad Austral de Chile, Valdivia, Chile.
M SalgadoInstituto de Medicina Preventiva Veterinaria, Universidad Austral de Chile, Valdivia, Chile. miguelsalgado@uach.cl.
Austral University of Chile · CL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The estimated herd and within herd Mycobacterium bovis (M. bovis) infection prevalence in the southern Chile regions are 0.3 and 0.67%, respectively. However, higher rates of infection still remain in some herds. In parallel, it is well established that a big proportion of cattle herds are infected with Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis (MAP), which has been also associated with a clear interference effect on M. bovis diagnosis. The present study aims to provide more insights about the diagnostic interference for Mycobacterium bovis detection due to co-infection with MAP. To better understand the dynamics of this identified interference, the effect of MAP genotype present, as well as MAP faecal shedding values (as proxy of the infection progression), for each of the CFT results was compared. No relationship was observed between MAP genotype with any type of differential response to the diagnostic tests of M. bovis infection. However, MAP shedding values in animals with positive CFT diagnostic results for M. bovis infection was significantly lower than animals with a negative CFT result, observing that as the MAP shedding load raises, the response to the bovine tuberculin test tends to be negative. The findings reported in this study allows to interpret that one of the causes of the prolonged elimination of M. bovis infection from some cattle herds may be due in part to the advanced MAP infection status in co-infected individuals affecting the outcome of screening in-vivo diagnostic techniques such as CFT. These false negative animals that show negative results to M. bovis detection tests, may maintain the infection at herd level and spread the pathogen to healthy individuals.

Indexed as

CoinfectionMycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosisMycobacterium bovisAnimalsCattleChileCross ReactionsFecesParatuberculosisPrevalenceSensitivity and SpecificityTuberculin TestTuberculosis, BovineBovine tuberculosisCFTInterferenceMAPM. bovisParatuberculosisPCR

Identifiers

PMID31807982
OpenAlexW2993147348

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.