ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2020
Quantitative [
Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Preclinical and preliminary clinical evaluation of [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Trial
- Article
- Diffuse uptake in the subcutaneous tissue onEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Article
- Recent Advances in Positron Emission Tomography Radiotracers to Image Cardiac Amyloidosis.Current cardiology reports · 2024Review
- Prognostic Value of Left VentricularJACC. Cardiovascular imaging · 2024Article
- Quantification of right ventricular amyloid burden with 18F-florbetapir positron emission tomography/computed tomography and its association with right ventricular dysfunction and outcomes in light-chain amyloidosis.European heart journal. Cardiovascular Imaging · 2024Article
- Molecular Design of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Agents Binding to Amyloid Deposits.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- AL Amyloidosis for Cardiologists: Awareness, Diagnosis, and Future Prospects:JACC. CardioOncology · 2022Review
- Pulmonary 99mTc-HMDP uptake correlates with restrictive ventilatory defects and abnormal lung reactance in transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis patients.Respiratory research · 2022Article
- Cardiac Amyloidosis: Multimodal Imaging of Disease Activity and Response to Treatment.Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging · 2021Review
- Pilot Study of F18-Florbetapir in the Early Evaluation of Cardiac Amyloidosis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2021Article
- Multimodality Imaging in the Evaluation and Management of Cardiac Amyloidosis.Seminars in nuclear medicine · 2020Review
- Diagnosing cardiac amyloidosis in every-day practice: A practical guide for the cardiologist.International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe clinical diagnosis of pulmonary involvement in individuals with systemic AL amyloidosis remains challenging. [
methodsWe prospectively enrolled 58 subjects with biopsy-proven AL amyloidosis and 9 control subjects (5 without amyloidosis and 4 with ATTR cardiac amyloidosis). Pulmonary [
resultsOn visual analysis, pulmonary tracer uptake was absent in most AL subjects (40/58, 69%); 12% (7/58) of AL subjects demonstrated intense bilateral homogeneous tracer uptake. In this group, compared to the control group, Vs (median Vs 30-fold higher, 9.79 vs. 0.26, p < 0.001), TBR (median TBR 12.0 vs. 1.71, p < 0.001), and RI (median RI 0.310 vs. 0.033, p < 0.001) were substantially higher. Notably, the AL group without visually apparent pulmonary [
conclusions[
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.