Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31807879›Full record

ArticleCancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII2020

Tailoring early-phase clinical trial design to address multiple research objectives.

Nolan A Wages, Craig L Slingluff, Timothy N Bullock, Gina R Petroni

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Personalized Cancer Vaccines: Clinical Landscape, Challenges, and Opportunities.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2021
    Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nolan A WagesDivision of Translational Research and Applied Statistics, Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia, P.O. Box 800717, Charlottesville, VA, USA. nwages@virginia.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2190-4864
Craig L SlingluffDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Timothy N BullockDepartment of Pathology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Gina R PetroniDivision of Translational Research and Applied Statistics, Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia, P.O. Box 800717, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
University of Virginia · US

Funding

Designs for phase I trials of combinations of agentsR01CA142859 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI CONAWAY, MARK R · 2010 to 2017
$2.1M
Phase I Designs for Combined Immunotherapies in CancerK25CA181638 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI WAGES, NOLAN · 2014 to 2018
$780k
Melanoma Research Alliance Team Science AwardNCI NIH HHS K25 CA181638NCI NIH HHS K25CA181638NCI NIH HHS R01 CA142859NCI NIH HHS R01CA142859
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIn contemporary oncology drug development, implementation of novel early-phase designs with the ability to address multiple research objectives is needed to better refine regimens. This paper describes an adaptive design strategy for identifying a range of optimal regimens based on two endpoints within multiple cohorts. The proposed design was developed to address objectives in an early-phase trial of cancer vaccines in combination with agonistic antibodies to CD40 and CD27. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe describe a model-based design strategy that was developed for a trial evaluating the safety and immunogenicity of vaccination with (1) peptides plus CD40 antibody and TLR3 ligand, (2) systemic administration of an agonistic CD27 antibody, and (3) to assess immune response from (1) and (2) compared to optimal controls in participants with stage IIB-IV melanoma. RESULTS AND

conclusionsThe proposed design is a practical adaptive method for use with combined immunotherapy regimens with multiple objectives within multiple cohorts of interest. Further advances in the effectiveness of cancer immunotherapies will require new approaches that include redefining optimal strategies to take multiple regimens forward into later phases, incorporating additional endpoints in the dose selection process and testing drug combination therapies to improve efficacy and reduce toxicity. Our goal is to facilitate the acceptance and application of more novel designs in contemporary early development trials.

Indexed as

Research DesignAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalCancer VaccinesCD40 AntigensClinical Trials, Phase I as TopicClinical Trials, Phase II as TopicCombined Modality TherapyDrug DevelopmentHumansImmunotherapyMelanomaSkin NeoplasmsTumor Necrosis Factor Receptor Superfamily, Member 7Antineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalCancer VaccinesCD40 AntigensTumor Necrosis Factor Receptor Superfamily, Member 7Adaptive designCancer vaccinesCombinationEarly-phase

Identifiers

PMID31807879
PMCPMC6952569
OpenAlexW2992363221

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.