Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31807870›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2020

Multiple methods used for type detection of uniparental disomy in paternity testing.

Hongliang Su, Tingting Sun, Man Chen, Jinding Liu, Xiao Wang, Yaming Chen, Wenyan Ren, Gengqian Zhang, Jiangwei Yan, Keming Yun

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Hongliang Su *School of Forensic Medicine, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, 030001, People's Republic of China. hongliangsu@sxmu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4593-6078
Tingting Sun *School of Forensic Medicine, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, 030001, People's Republic of China.
Man ChenUniversity of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, People's Republic of China.
Jinding LiuSchool of Forensic Medicine, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, 030001, People's Republic of China.
Xiao WangSchool of Forensic Medicine, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, 030001, People's Republic of China.
Yaming ChenYuncheng Public Security Bureau, Yuncheng, 044000, People's Republic of China.
Wenyan RenInstitute of Forensic Science, Public Security Bureau of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, 310009, People's Republic of China.
Gengqian ZhangSchool of Forensic Medicine, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, 030001, People's Republic of China.
Jiangwei YanSchool of Forensic Medicine, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, 030001, People's Republic of China. yanjw@sxmu.edu.cn.
Keming YunSchool of Forensic Medicine, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, 030001, People's Republic of China. yunkeming5142@163.com.

Funding

Key Technologies Research and Development Program 2017YFC0803504National Natural Science Foundation of China 81601655Shanxi Provincial Key Research and Development Project 201803D31069Shanxi Scholarship Council of China 2016-055ShanXi Science and Technology Department 201601D021144
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Uniparental disomy (UPD) has attracted more attention recently in paternity testing, though it is an infrequent genetic event. Although short tandem repeat (STR) profiling has been widely used in paternity testing, it is not sufficient to use STR only to judge the genetic relationship, because the existence of UPD will inevitably affect the results of genotyping. Compared with complete UPD, segmental UPD is more difficult to detect because it does not affect all genotypes on the same chromosome. It is necessary to determine the type of UPD with multiple methods because a single method is not sufficient. Therefore, it is advisable to detect UPD in paternity testing with multiple methods. In this study, after autosomal STR profiling was used, we found that there were several gene loci on the same chromosome that did not conform to Mendelian genetic law, thus we highly suspected the existence of UPD and performed X-STR profiling immediately. Then whole-genome single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array analysis was performed to identify the type, and the results provided straightforward evidence for distinguishing complete from segmental UPD. Lastly, we used deletion insertion polymorphism (DIP)-SNP SNaPshot assay and Miseq FGx sequencing (for SNP and STR) to determine whether the mutation source is maternal uniparental disomy (mUPD) or paternal uniparental disomy (pUPD). To avoid false exclusion of kinship, it is vital to determine the type of UPD in paternity testing and effective strategies based on multiple methods to detect the type of UPD are provided in this study.

Indexed as

Molecular Diagnostic TechniquesPaternityAdultChildDNA FingerprintingFemaleGene FrequencyGenetic TestingGenotypeHumansINDEL MutationMaleMicrosatellite RepeatsPolymorphism, Single NucleotideUniparental DisomyMiseq FGx sequencingPaternity testingShort tandem repeat profilingSNaPshot assayUniparental disomyWhole-genome SNP array analysis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.