Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31807848›Full record

ArticleJournal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology2020

Intracranial pressure in the American Alligator (Alligator mississippiensis): reptilian meninges and orthostatic gradients.

Tatyana Kondrashova, Joshua Blanchard, Lucas Knoche, James Potter, Bruce A Young

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Stuck on you: Meninges cellular crosstalk in development.Current opinion in neurobiology · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tatyana KondrashovaDepartment of Family Medicine, Preventive Medicine, and Community Health, Kirksville College of Osteopathic Medicine, A.T. Still University, Kirksville, MO, USA.
Joshua BlanchardDepartment of Anesthesiology, Northeast Regional Medical Center, Kirksville, MO, USA.
Lucas KnocheDepartment of Anatomy, Kirksville College of Osteopathic Medicine, A.T. Still University, Kirksville, MO, USA.
James PotterDepartment of Surgery, Kirksville College of Osteopathic Medicine, A.T. Still University, Kirksville, MO, USA.
Bruce A YoungDepartment of Anatomy, Kirksville College of Osteopathic Medicine, A.T. Still University, Kirksville, MO, USA. byoung@atsu.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-0988-7731
A.T. Still University · USRegional Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cranial meninges of reptiles differ from the more widely studied mammalian pattern in that the intraventricular and subarachnoid spaces are, at least partially, isolated. This study was undertaken to investigate the bulk flow of cerebrospinal fluid, and the resulting changes in intracranial pressure, in a common reptilian species. Intracranial pressure was measured using ocular ultrasonography and by surgically implanting pressure cannulae into the cranial subarachnoid space. The system was then challenged by: rotating the animal to create orthostatic gradients, perturbation of the vascular system, administration of epinephrine, and cephalic cutaneous heating. Pressure changes determined from the implanted catheters and through quantification of the optic nerve sheath were highly correlated and showed a significant linear relationship with orthostatic gradients. The catheter pressure responses were phasic, with an initial rapid response followed by a much slower response; each phase accounted for roughly half of the total pressure change. No significant relationship was found between intracranial pressure and either heart rate or blood flow. The focal application of heat and the administration of epinephrine both increased intracranial pressure, the latter influence being particularly pronounced.

Indexed as

Alligators and CrocodilesAnimalsHeart RateHemodynamicsIntracranial HypertensionIntracranial PressureMeningesUltrasonographyBarostatic reflexCerebrospinal fluidOcular ultrasonographyOptic nerve sheathReptile

Identifiers

PMID31807848
OpenAlexW2992335152

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.