Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31807800›Full record

ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2020

Titanized polypropylene mesh in laparoscopic sacral colpopexy.

Giuseppe Campagna, Luigi Pedone Anchora, Giovanni Panico, Daniela Caramazza, Martina Arcieri, Mauro Cervigni, Giovanni Scambia, Alfredo Ercoli

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International urogynecology journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Sacrocolpopexy: Alternatives to Mesh Grafts.International urogynecology journal · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy mesh excision step-by-step.International urogynecology journal · 2023
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Giuseppe CampagnaDepartment of Female and Child Health and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Women's Health Area, Rome, Italy.
Luigi Pedone AnchoraDepartment of Female and Child Health and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Women's Health Area, Rome, Italy.
Giovanni PanicoDepartment of Female and Child Health and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Women's Health Area, Rome, Italy. giovanni.panico@policlinicogemelli.it.ORCID 0000-0001-5473-9503
Daniela CaramazzaDepartment of Female and Child Health and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Women's Health Area, Rome, Italy.
Martina ArcieriDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ospedale Maggiore della Carità Università degli Studi del Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy.
Mauro CervigniClinica Paideia, Rome, Italy.
Giovanni ScambiaDepartment of Female and Child Health and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Women's Health Area, Rome, Italy.
Alfredo ErcoliPID Ginecologia Oncologica e Chirurgia Ginecologica Miniinvasiva, Università degli studi di Messina, Policlinico G. Martino, Messina, Italy.
Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic · ITAzienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Policlinico "G. Martino" · ITFondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico · ITUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThis study investigated perioperative and mid-term clinical outcomes after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSCP) with light titanium-coated polypropylene (TCP) mesh in a large group of patients affected by International Continence Society stage II-IV pelvic organ prolapse (POP).

methodsThis multicenter retrospective study included 217 patients treated with LSCP using TCP mesh. We aimed to (1) analyze the intra- and postoperative complication rates according to the ICS/IUGA Complication Classification Code guidelines, (2) evaluate the anatomical results and (3) assess postoperative patient satisfaction with the Patient Global Impression Improvement questionnaire. Nonparametric Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, χ2 test and Fisher's exact test were used where appropriate.

resultsThe intraoperative complications were two (0.9%) cases of hemorrhage, two (0.9%) cases of incidental cystotomy and four (1.8%) cases of incidental colpotomy. During the postoperative follow-up, we recorded mesh exposure in 3 (1.4%) out of 217 patients. These 3 patients were from a group of 22 women who underwent vaginal opening during surgery, while in the remaining 195 patients without incidental colpotomy, no mesh exposure was observed (13.6% vs. 0.0%, p < 0.001). No failure of the apical compartment was observed, while 3 (1.4%) out of 217 patients experienced isolated anterior recurrence, and 1 (0.4%) patient had isolated posterior recurrence. All patients reported PGI-I scores ≥ 3, and 209 patients (96.3%) had a PGI-I score ≥ 2.

conclusionsThe use of light TCP mesh is safe and effective during LSCP for POP repair from both an anatomical and a functional point of view, posing a very low postoperative mesh-related complication risk.

Indexed as

LaparoscopyPelvic Organ ProlapseSurgical MeshAdultAgedFemaleGynecologic Surgical ProceduresHumansMiddle AgedPolypropylenesRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomePolypropylenesLaparoscopic sacrocolpopexyLight titanium-coated polypropylene meshPelvic organ prolapsePerioperative morbidityPostoperative patient satisfaction

Identifiers

PMID31807800
OpenAlexW2992026103

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.