ArticleDer Anaesthesist2020
[Lege artis eye coverage performed during gynecological/urological laser surgery. Results of a survey of nursing experts].
Article in Der Anaesthesist, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIntraoperative eye protection is generally important during surgery in patients under general anesthesia. There are, however, challenges that arise when a laser is used intraoperatively. In gynecological and urological diseases lasers are increasingly being used for treatment but a lege artis eye cover or protection has not yet been investigated in the international literature.
objectiveAccording to nursing experts, how is a lege artis eye coverage performed during gynecological and urological laser surgery? MATERIAL AND
methodsIn order to answer the research question, standardized expert interviews were carried out via telephone, direct face to face interviews and e‑mails with experts from specialized clinics in Austria. The results of a nonsystematic literature search formed the basis for the interview guidelines.
resultsIn this study 11 experts agreed to participate in a qualitative survey. The result of the interviews recommended the use of skin-friendly plasters in combination with a vitamin D eye ointment, special plasters/covers and/or laser safety goggles with a vitamin D eye ointment and NaCl dressings. In addition to the direct protection of the eye, a periodic intraoperative eyelid closure check must be performed.
conclusionThe findings from the expert interviews are to be understood as practice recommendations. Further research is needed in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.