Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31807651›Full record

ArticleArchives animal breeding2019

Interbreed variation in meiotic recombination rate and distribution in the domestic chicken

Lyubov P Malinovskaya, Katerina V Tishakova, Natalia A Volkova, Anna A Torgasheva, Yakov A Tsepilov, Pavel M Borodin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives animal breeding, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Fourth Report on Chicken Genes and Chromosomes 2022.Cytogenetic and genome research · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lyubov P MalinovskayaInstitute of Cytology and Genetics SB RAS, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6717-844X
Katerina V TishakovaInstitute of Cytology and Genetics SB RAS, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russia.
Natalia A VolkovaL. K. Ernst Federal Science Center for Animal Husbandry, Dubrovitsy, 142132, Russia.
Anna A TorgashevaInstitute of Cytology and Genetics SB RAS, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russia.
Yakov A TsepilovInstitute of Cytology and Genetics SB RAS, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russia.
Pavel M BorodinInstitute of Cytology and Genetics SB RAS, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russia.
Novosibirsk State University · RUFederal Scientific Center for Animal Husbandry named after Academician L.K. Ernst · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The efficiency of natural and artificial selection is critically dependent on the recombination rate. However, interbreed and individual variation in recombination rate in poultry remains unknown. Conventional methods of analysis of recombination such as genetic linkage analysis, sperm genotyping and chiasma count at lampbrush chromosomes are expensive and time-consuming. In this study, we analyzed the number and distribution of recombination nodules in spermatocytes of the roosters of six chicken breeds using immunolocalization of key proteins involved in chromosome pairing and recombination. We revealed significant effects of breed (

Identifiers

PMID31807651
PMCPMC6859913
OpenAlexW2957671113

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.