Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31807563›Full record

ReviewAnnals of translational medicine2019

Combination of laparoscopic and endoscopic approaches for neoplasia with non-exposure technique (CLEAN-NET) for gastric submucosal tumors: updated advantages and limitations.

Manabu Onimaru, Haruhiro Inoue, Haruo Ikeda, Mary Raina Angeli Abad, Bianca Maria Quarta Colosso, Yuto Shimamura, Kazuya Sumi, Yoshio Deguchi, Hiroaki Ito, Noboru Yokoyama

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of translational medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Manabu OnimaruDigestive Diseases Center, Showa University Koto Toyosu Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Haruhiro InoueDigestive Diseases Center, Showa University Koto Toyosu Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Haruo IkedaDigestive Diseases Center, Showa University Koto Toyosu Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Mary Raina Angeli AbadDigestive Diseases Center, Showa University Koto Toyosu Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Bianca Maria Quarta ColossoDigestive Diseases Center, Showa University Koto Toyosu Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Yuto ShimamuraDigestive Diseases Center, Showa University Koto Toyosu Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Kazuya SumiDigestive Diseases Center, Showa University Koto Toyosu Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Yoshio DeguchiDigestive Diseases Center, Showa University Koto Toyosu Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Hiroaki ItoDigestive Diseases Center, Showa University Koto Toyosu Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Noboru YokoyamaDigestive Diseases Center, Showa University Koto Toyosu Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Showa University · JPShowa University Koto Toyosu Hospital

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery (LECS) for gastric submucosal tumors (SMTs) has been developed under the concept of resecting gastric tumors with both complete curability and preserving organ functions. Precise resection is obtained by classical LECS, however, concerns regarding intraoperative bacterial infection and dissemination of the tumor cells into the abdominal cavity by LECS with exposure technique still remain. To prevent these concerns, several LECS-related procedures with non-exposure techniques, such as combination of laparoscopic and endoscopic approaches for neoplasia with non-exposure technique (CLEAN-NET) and non-exposed endoscopic wall-inversion surgery (NEWS), have been reported to be safe and feasible. Classical LECS, CLEAN-NET, and NEWS have the same concept, however, each has its own different characteristic procedures; exposure or non-exposure technique, inversion of the tumor into or outer the lumen, retrieval of tumor per oral or through the abdominal cavity, and dominance in the role of the endoscopist or the laparoscopic surgeon. Familiarization with these procedure details is important to understand their indications, advantages and limitations, resulting in providing a tailored minimally invasive surgery for patients. The main scope of this review article is to introduce readers to the clinical application, procedure, and results of CLEAN-NET, both from previous literatures and from our experience, as well as to offer a closer look at its advantages and limitations while comparing with other LECS procedures from the viewpoint of introducing CLEAN-NET first.

Indexed as

combination of laparoscopic and endoscopic approaches for neoplasia with non-exposure technique (CLEAN-NET)gastric submucosal tumors (SMTs)Laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery (LECS)non-exposed endoscopic wall-inversion surgery (NEWS)

Identifiers

PMID31807563
PMCPMC6861760
OpenAlexW2981912684

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.