ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2019
Rapid and sensitive detection of
Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Recent Progress in Nanoparticle-Based Biosensors for MonitoringBiosensors · 2026Review
- Rapid and sensitive detection of feline herpesvirus-1 using fluorescent microspheres as labels for immunochromatographic test strips.Veterinary research communications · 2026Article
- Article
- An RPA-Based CRISPR/Cas12a Assay in Combination with a Lateral Flow Assay for the Rapid Detection ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Rapid quantitative detection ofFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Article
- Article
- Development of a Kit for Rapid Immunochromatographic Detection of Sacbrood Virus InfectingViruses · 2021Article
- Multiplex PCR method for simultaneous detection of five pathogenic bacteria closely related to foodborne diseases.3 Biotech · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBacillary dysentery caused by
methodsSixty-three clinical samples of
resultsUnder optimized conditions, the lower detection limits of PCR-ICTS, PCR-GE and RTFQ-PCR were 2.5×10
conclusionsThe results from immunochromatographic test were agreement with those from API Coryne system and RTFQ-PCR. Hence, this developed method might be useful for screening and monitoring clinical sample of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.