Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31807527›Full record

ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2019

Value of computed tomography evaluation in pathologic classification and prognosis prediction of gastric neuroendocrine tumors.

Shida Yan, Tongtong Liu, Ying Li, Yongjian Zhu, Jun Jiang, Liming Jiang, Hong Zhao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Shida YanDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, National Cancer Center, Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China.
Tongtong LiuDepartment of Radiology, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100020, China.
Ying LiDepartment of Radiology, National Cancer Center, Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China.
Yongjian ZhuDepartment of Radiology, National Cancer Center, Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China.
Jun JiangDepartment of Radiology, National Cancer Center, Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China.
Liming JiangDepartment of Radiology, National Cancer Center, Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China.
Hong ZhaoDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, National Cancer Center, Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe study aims to investigate the correlation of CT characteristics with pathological classifications and the prognostic value of CT features in patients with gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms (g-NENs).

methodsNinety-one cases of pathologically diagnosed g-NENs, including 15 cases of well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) (G1 and G2) and 76 cases of poor-differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) (G3 and MANEC) were retrospectively studied. All cases were included in correlation analysis of CT characteristics with pathologic grades. Among them, 76 patients who had fulfilled follow-up data were included for overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) analysis.

resultsCT characteristics that favor poor differentiation include tumor location (fundus and cardia), larger tumor size (>3.0 cm), infiltrative growth, unclear tumor margin, serosa involvement, ulceration and lymph node metastasis (P<0.05). Most variables had sensitivities >80% and specificities >60% to distinguish NECs from NETs. Through log-rank analysis, it was revealed that serosa involvement, cystic degeneration, necrosis, heterogeneous enhancement and lymph node metastasis led to worse DFS and OS for patients with g-NENs (P<0.05). COX regression analysis showed that serosa involvement and lymph node metastasis were independent risk factor for DFS and OS, respectively, despite of grading, staging and therapeutic choices (P<0.05). Moreover, high Ki-67 index (>55%) in G3 g-NENs is in correlation with serosa involvement and lymph node metastasis; accordingly, patients with higher Ki-67 index had worse 1-year DFS (61.7%

conclusionsCT characteristics can be useful discriminators and prognostic factors for g-NENs and may help identify G3 g-NEC from G3 g-NEN by revealing its poor differentiation and high invasive potential.

Indexed as

multidetector computed tomography (CT)neuroendocrine tumors (NETs)pathologyStomach neoplasmssurvival analysis

Identifiers

PMID31807527
PMCPMC6861764

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.