Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31807518›Full record

ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2019

Incidence and survival outcomes of early male breast cancer: a population-based comparison with early female breast cancer.

Yan Wang, Kai Chen, Yaping Yang, Luyuan Tan, Lili Chen, Liling Zhu, Fengxi Su, Xue Liu, Shunrong Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Matched-pair long-term survival analysis of male and female patients with breast cancer: a population-based study.Translational breast cancer research : a journal focusing on translational research in breast cancer · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Yan WangGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510120, China.
Kai ChenGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510120, China.
Yaping YangGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510120, China.
Luyuan TanGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510120, China.
Lili ChenGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510120, China.
Liling ZhuGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510120, China.
Fengxi SuGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510120, China.
Xue LiuCollege of Basic Medicine, Jining Medical University, Jining 272067, China.
Shunrong LiGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510120, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMale breast cancer (MBC) is a rare malignancy. We aimed to analyze the incidence trends, clinicopathological characteristics, and survival outcomes in early MBC comparison with early female breast cancer (FBC).

methodsWe included eligible MBC and FBC patients with stage I-II disease in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database from 2000-2015. Joinpoint regression was used to evaluate the trends in age-adjusted incidence. A one-to-four propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was performed to reduce bias in a retrospective study. Survival outcomes were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier analyses with the log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards regression analysis.

resultsTrends in the age-adjusted incidence rates of early MBC were stable [2000-2015, annual percentage change (APC) =0.50, 95% confidence interval (CI): -0.1 to 1.1, P=0.102]; however, the incidence of early FBC changed significantly over the time period (2000-2015, APC = 0.30, 95% CI: 0.0 to 0.6, P=0.045). In the matched cohort, unmarried status, higher grade, larger tumor size, and advanced lymph node (LN) status were associated with a higher risk of breast cancer death and death of any causes both in early MBC and FBC patients. The hormone receptor (HR) status was as a prognostic factor in FBC patients, but not in MBC. Early MBC had worse breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) and overall survival (OS) than early FBC in stage I, stage II and HR-positive subgroup of patients.

conclusionsThe biological behavior, clinicopathological features, and clinical outcomes of early MBC are different from that of FBC. Further studies on individualized treatment approaches in MBC are needed.

Indexed as

incidenceMale breast cancer (MBC)prognosispropensity score matching (PSM)

Identifiers

PMID31807518
PMCPMC6861739

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.