Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31807223›Full record

ArticleCanadian medical education journal2019

Medical Assistance in Dying: the opinions of medical trainees in Newfoundland and Labrador. A cross- sectional study.

Robert McCarthy, Melanie Seal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian medical education journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Robert McCarthyFaculty of Medicine, Memorial University, Newfoundland, Canada.
Melanie SealFaculty of Medicine, Memorial University, Newfoundland, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMedical Assistance in Dying (MAiD) was legalized in Canada in 2016. As future physicians, medical trainees may face decisions regarding MAiD. Although many publications exist internationally, Canadian data is limited in the peer-reviewed literature, particularly following legalization. The purpose of this study is to determine the opinions of medical trainees in Newfoundland and Labrador regarding MAiD, and the factors that impact these views.

methodsA survey was distributed to all under- and postgraduate medical trainees at Memorial University (N=570), the only medical school in Newfoundland and Labrador. The survey collected demographic information and opinions regarding MAiD. Respondents were divided into groups based on demographic characteristics, and their responses analyzed using non-parametric statistics.

resultsThe survey was completed by 124 trainees. Ninety percent of respondents agreed with the legalization of MAiD in Canada and nearly 60% stated they would perform the procedure for their patients. Several factors influenced the opinions of medical trainees, including level of training and religious affiliation. Trainees also favored detachment from the MAiD process.

interpretationMedical trainees in Newfoundland and Labrador are largely in favor of MAiD. This may highlight the importance of emphasizing MAiD within medical curricula, so that trainees are adequately informed and prepared for this new aspect of medical care upon joining independent practice.

Identifiers

PMID31807223
PMCPMC6892315

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.