Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31807118›Full record

ArticleCancer cell international2019

Identification of novel cell glycolysis related gene signature predicting survival in patients with endometrial cancer.

Zi-Hao Wang, Yun-Zheng Zhang, Yu-Shan Wang, Xiao-Xin Ma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer cell international, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. SCENE: Signature Collection for Endometrial Cancer Prognosis.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Claudin-9 (Cancer pathogenesis and therapy · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. A Glycolysis and gluconeogenesis-related model for breast cancer prognosis.Cancer biomarkers : section A of Disease markers · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Zi-Hao WangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Key Laboratory of Obstetrics and Gynecology of Higher Education of Liaoning Province, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, 39 Huaxiang Road, Shenyang, 110021 People's Republic of China.
Yun-Zheng ZhangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Key Laboratory of Obstetrics and Gynecology of Higher Education of Liaoning Province, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, 39 Huaxiang Road, Shenyang, 110021 People's Republic of China.
Yu-Shan WangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Key Laboratory of Obstetrics and Gynecology of Higher Education of Liaoning Province, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, 39 Huaxiang Road, Shenyang, 110021 People's Republic of China.
Xiao-Xin MaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Key Laboratory of Obstetrics and Gynecology of Higher Education of Liaoning Province, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, 39 Huaxiang Road, Shenyang, 110021 People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-7361-3196

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEndometrial cancer (EC) is one of the three major gynecological malignancies. Numerous biomarkers that may be associated with survival and prognosis have been identified through database mining in previous studies. However, the predictive ability of single-gene biomarkers is not sufficiently specific. Genetic signatures may be an improved option for prediction. This study aimed to explore data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) to identify a new genetic signature for predicting the prognosis of EC.

methodsmRNA expression profiling was performed in a group of patients with EC (n = 548) from TCGA. Gene set enrichment analysis was performed to identify gene sets that were significantly different between EC tissues and normal tissues. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to identify genes significantly associated with overall survival. Quantitative real-time-PCR was used to verify the reliability of the expression of selected mRNAs. Subsequent multivariate Cox regression analysis was used to establish a prognostic risk parameter formula. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates and the log-rank test were used to validate the significance of risk parameters for prognosis prediction.

resultNine genes associated with glycolysis (

conclusionA nine-gene signature associated with cellular glycolysis for predicting the survival of patients with EC was developed. The findings provide insight into the mechanisms of cellular glycolysis and identification of patients with poor prognosis in EC.

Indexed as

Endometrial cancerGlycolysismRNAPrognosticSurvival

Identifiers

PMID31807118
PMCPMC6857303

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.