Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31807087›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of women's health2019

Induction Of Labor Among Singleton Pregnancies In Six Palestinian Governmental Hospitals: A Population-Based Cohort Study.

Sahar Hassan, Katariina Laine, Erik Fosse, Niveen Me Abu-Rmeileh, Hadil Y Ali-Masri, Mohammed Zimmo, Kaled Zimmo, Åse Vikanes, Khaled M Ismail

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of women's health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02427854 (Can Perineal Tears and Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injuries in Palestine be Prevented? A Study of Two Different Interventions), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02427854 nacompletednot on this map

Can Perineal Tears and Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injuries in Palestine be Prevented? A Study of Two Different Interventions

TypeinterventionalSponsorOslo University HospitalRan2015 to 2018Enrolled51,041ConditionsComplication of Labor and DeliveryArmsEducation by animated training video, Interactive hands-on bedside training
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Sahar HassanDepartment of Nursing, Faculty of Pharmacy, Nursing and Health Professions, Birzeit University, Ramallah, Palestine.ORCID 0000-0002-6887-9993
Katariina LaineDepartment of Obstetrics, Oslo University Hospital, Ullevål, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-9970-8401
Erik FosseIntervention Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway.
Niveen Me Abu-RmeilehInstitute of Community and Public Health, Birzeit University, Ramallah, Palestine.
Hadil Y Ali-MasriIntervention Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway.
Mohammed ZimmoIntervention Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-0177-4521
Kaled ZimmoIntervention Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-8413-082X
Åse VikanesIntervention Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway.
Khaled M IsmailDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, Pilsen, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0001-9449-0706
Oslo University Hospital · NOBirzeit University · PSCharles University · CZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo explore rates and review practices regarding induction of labor (IOL) among singleton pregnancies in Palestine.

designA prospective population-based cohort study.

settingSix secondary and tertiary governmental hospitals located in the two regions of Palestine: West Bank and Gaza.

participantsSingleton pregnancies who had IOL in participating units during the study period were included (n=8290). Women having multiple gestations (1004), planned cesarean births (703), those admitted with cervical dilation >6cm (11228), and pregnancies with no record of cervical dilation and/or gestational age on admission (219) were excluded. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE: Rates of IOL in participating units and regions.

resultsThere were a total of 33,402 singleton births during the study period with an IOL rate of 24.8%. Rates of IOL significantly varied between units, ranging from 12.9% to 45.6% (P-value <0.05). The majority of women with no previous uterine scar were induced at gestational ages ≤40 weeks where 43.8% were induced at 39-40 gestational weeks (29.9% multiparous; 13.9% nulliparous) and 17.7% were induced between 37 and 38 gestational weeks (11.9% multiparous; 5.8% nulliparous).

conclusionSignificant variations in IOL practices between Palestinian hospitals and regions suggest overuse of IOL among singleton pregnancies in some units with the majority of these being performed before 40 weeks' gestation. These findings indicate a gap between implementation of best evidence and current clinical practice.

Indexed as

childbirthcohort studyinduction of laborPalestinesingletonvariations

Identifiers

PMID31807087
PMCPMC6844209
OpenAlexW2984009400

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.