ArticleJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2019
Patients' Perceptions Of The Quality Of Palliative Care And Satisfaction - A Cluster Analysis.
Article in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Public and Private Healthcare Service Quality in Trujillo, Peru: Evidence from a SERVQUAL Survey.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Experience and satisfaction towards palliative care in an Ethiopian tertiary care setting: A mixed methods study of patients with cancer and caregivers.PLOS global public health · 2026Article
- Patient-centeredness and determinant factors of palliative care service for adult cancer patients in public hospitals of addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 2024: cross-sectional mixed method study.BMC palliative care · 2025Article
- Physicians' Perceptions of the Quality of Palliative Care and of the Importance of Collaboration in Interdisciplinary Teams in Norwegian Nursing Homes.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2025Article
- Describing Complexity in Palliative Home Care Through HexCom: A Cross-Sectional, Multicenter Study.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2020Article
- Development of a Short Form of the Questionnaire Quality from the Patient's Perspective for Palliative Care (QPP-PC).Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2020Article
- Patient-Reported Experiences and Associated Factors in a Norwegian Radiotherapy Setting: An Explorative Cross-Sectional Study.SAGE open nursingArticle
- Determinants of Patient Satisfaction in Indigenous Cancer Palliative Care Services.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposePalliative care services are multidisciplinary, and the quality needs to be evaluated from the patients' perspectives. The aim was to explore the patient profiles in palliative care with respect to patients' perception of the quality of palliative care received and patient satisfaction, and to describe and compare person-related and organization-related conditions that characterize the patient profiles. PATIENTS AND
methodsA cross-sectional study, including 140 patients from four different multidisciplinary palliative care contexts in Norway, was conducted in 2014. The Quality from the Patient's Perspective questionnaire for Palliative Care, which is based upon a person-centered theoretical model, was used. Satisfaction was measured by the Emotional Stress Reaction questionnaire. Person- and organization-related conditions were measured. Hierarchical cluster analysis, ANOVA, Pearson Chi-Square Test and ANCOVA were used.
resultsThree unique patient clusters with different patterns of perceptions of quality of care and satisfaction were identified; Cluster 1 (41%) had the best perception of care quality and were more satisfied, Cluster 2 (34%) had better perceptions of care quality and were most satisfied and Cluster 3 (25%) had worst perceptions of care quality and were less satisfied. The clusters were characterized by person-related conditions (eg, patients' sense of coherence and perceptions of subjective importance of the quality) as well as organization-related conditions (eg, physicians' competence and type of care services).
conclusionThe results can be used by multidisciplinary healthcare personnel to tailor quality work and improve person-centered care in palliative care contexts. Improvement initiatives should focus on implementing a person-centered approach, increasing the palliative care competence of the personnel and facilitate specialized palliative care services in the homecare context.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.