Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31806690›Full record

ReviewHaematologica2020

Microenvironmental contributions to hematopoietic stem cell aging.

Ya-Hsuan Ho, Simón Méndez-Ferrer

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Haematologica, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 96 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
96citing papers in PubMed
14.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

96 citing papers in PubMed, 148 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Hematopoietic Aging and Leukemia: Mechanistic and Therapeutic Insights.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Macrophages in Hematopoiesis and Related Blood Diseases.Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics · 2025
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

36 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Ya-Hsuan HoWellcome Trust-Medical Research Council Cambridge Stem Cell Institute and Department of Haematology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge yhh29@medschl.cam.ac.uk.
Simón Méndez-FerrerWellcome Trust-Medical Research Council Cambridge Stem Cell Institute and Department of Haematology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge sm2116@cam.ac.uk.
Medical Research Council · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 26670Medical Research Council MC_PC_12009Medical Research Council MR/V005421/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) aging was originally thought to be essentially an HSC-autonomous process, which is the focus of another review in the same issue of

Indexed as

Endothelial CellsHematopoietic Stem CellsCell DifferentiationStem Cell Niche

Identifiers

PMID31806690
PMCPMC6939521
OpenAlexW2992842952

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.