Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31806534›Full record

ArticleVaccine2020

Using classification and regression tree analysis to explore parental influenza vaccine decisions.

Yuki Lama, Gregory R Hancock, Vicki S Freimuth, Amelia M Jamison, Sandra Crouse Quinn

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yuki LamaDepartment of Family Science, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, United States. Electronic address: lamay@terpmail.umd.edu.
Gregory R HancockDepartment of Human Development and Quantitative Methods, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, United States.
Vicki S FreimuthCenter for Health and Risk Communication (Emeritus), University of Georgia, Athens, GA, United States.
Amelia M JamisonCenter for Health Equity, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, United States.
Sandra Crouse QuinnDepartment of Family Science, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, United States; Center for Health Equity, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, United States.
University of Maryland, College Park · USUniversity of Georgia · US

Funding

Uncovering and Addressing Cultural Beliefs Behind Vaccine Racial Disparities P20MD006737 · NIMHD · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI QUINN, SANDRA CROUSE, THOMAS, STEPHEN B. · 2012 to 2016
$5.9M
NIMHD NIH HHS P20 MD006737
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesInfluenza poses a public health threat for children and adults. The CDC recommends annual influenza vaccination for children <18 years, yet vaccine uptake remains low for children (57.9%) and adults (37.1%). Given that parental decision-making is key in childhood vaccine uptake, there is a critical need to understand vaccine hesitancy among parents who decide not to vaccinate their children. This study aims to explore predictors of children's influenza vaccine status given parental vaccination status and examine the factors that contribute to concordance or discordance between parental and children's vaccine uptake.

methodsClassification and regression tree (CART) analyses were used to identify drivers of parental decisions to vaccinate their children against influenza. Hierarchy and interactions of these variables in predicting children's vaccination status were explored.

resultsFrom a nationally representative sample of non-Hispanic Black and White parents who completed an online survey (n = 328), the main factors influencing parents' decisions to vaccinate their children were vaccine behavior following physician recommendation, knowledge of influenza recommendations for children, influenza vaccine confidence and disease risk. Among unvaccinated parents, the greatest concordance was observed among parents who usually do not get vaccinated following physician recommendation and had lower knowledge of recommendations for influenza vaccination for children. The greatest discordance was observed among unvaccinated parents who had lower hesitancy about recommended vaccines.

conclusionsUnderstanding drivers of parental decisions to vaccinate themselves and their children can provide insights on health communication and provider approaches to increase influenza vaccine coverage and prevent influenza related mortality.

Indexed as

Decision MakingInfluenza, HumanParentsAdolescentAdultChildFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansInfluenza VaccinesMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited StatesVaccinationYoung AdultInfluenza VaccinesChild healthInfluenzaInfluenza vaccinationVaccine decision-making

Identifiers

PMID31806534
PMCPMC6992466
OpenAlexW2992340030

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.