Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31806523›Full record

ArticleSchizophrenia research2020

Duration of the psychosis prodrome.

Albert R Powers, Jean Addington, Diana O Perkins, Carrie E Bearden, Kristin S Cadenhead, Tyrone D Cannon, Barbara A Cornblatt, Daniel H Mathalon, Larry J Seidman, Ming T Tsuang and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Schizophrenia research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Cannabis and Tobacco Co-Use Predicts Psychosis in Clinical High Risk Cohorts.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Full speed ahead on indicated prevention of psychosis.World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Albert R PowersDepartment of Psychiatry and the Connecticut Mental Health Center, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA. Electronic address: albert.powers@yale.edu.
Jean AddingtonDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Diana O PerkinsDepartment of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Carrie E BeardenDepartment of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences and Psychology, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Kristin S CadenheadDepartment of Psychiatry, UCSD, San Diego, CA, USA.
Tyrone D CannonDepartment of Psychology and Psychiatry, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
Barbara A CornblattDepartment of Psychiatry, Zucker Hillside Hospital, Long Island, NY, USA.
Daniel H MathalonDepartment of Psychiatry, UCSF, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Larry J SeidmanDepartment of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Ming T TsuangDepartment of Psychiatry, UCSD, San Diego, CA, USA.
Elaine F WalkerDepartment of Psychology and Psychiatry, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Thomas H McGlashanDepartment of Psychiatry and the Connecticut Mental Health Center, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
Scott W WoodsDepartment of Psychiatry and the Connecticut Mental Health Center, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.

Funding

A Hearing Test for Hallucinations: Toward Development of Computational Markers for Early DiagnosisK23MH115252 · NIMH · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI POWERS, ALBERT R · 2018 to 2022
$983k
NIMH NIH HHS K23 MH115252
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The recognition of a prodromal period preceding the onset of frank psychosis dates back to its first descriptions. Despite insights gained from a prospective approach to the study of the Clinical High Risk syndrome for psychosis (CHR-P), a prospectively-based understanding of the duration of the psychosis prodrome and the factors that may influence is not well-established. Here we analyze data from the second North American Prodrome Longitudinal Study (NAPLS-2) to characterize prodrome duration in those who converted to psychosis. Of the 764 participants identified as being at CHR-P, 94 converted to psychosis and 92 of these had recorded estimates of prodrome onset. Estimates of prodrome duration were derived from CHR-P syndrome onset and conversion dates from the Structured Interview for Psychosis-risk Syndromes. Results identified a mean prodrome duration of 21.6 months. Neither CHR-P sub-syndrome nor medication exposure was found to significantly influence prodrome duration in this sample. These results provide the most precise estimate of prodrome duration to date, although results are limited to prodromes identified by ascertainment as being at CHR-P. Our findings also suggest a rule of thirds with regard to prodrome duration in those followed for two years: one third of CHR-P patients who convert will do so by 1 year after CHR-P syndrome onset, another third 1-2 years after onset, and the final third more than 2 years after onset.

Indexed as

Psychotic DisordersHumansLongitudinal StudiesProdromal SymptomsClinical high riskDurationProdromePsychosis

Identifiers

PMID31806523
PMCPMC7539292

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.