ArticleInternational journal of cardiology2020
Cardiometabolic responses to cardiac rehabilitation in people with and without diabetes.
Article in International journal of cardiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Benefits of cardiac rehabilitation following acute coronary syndrome for patients with and without diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2022Pooled it
- Determinants of Maximal Oxygen Consumption in Cardiac Rehabilitation Patients: The Role of Sex.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Change in Cardiometabolic Health Following Participation in Cardiac Rehabilitation for Coronary Heart Disease: Effect Modification by Metabolic Syndrome Status.Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2024Article
- Influence of Risk Factors on Exercise Tolerance in Patients after Myocardial Infarction-Early Cardiac Rehabilitation in Poland.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundType 2 diabetes and cardiometabolic comorbidities manifesting as the metabolic syndrome (MetS) are highly prevalent in coronary heart disease (CHD) patients attending cardiac rehabilitation (CR). The study aimed to determine the prevalence of cardiometabolic derangements and MetS, and compare post-CR clinical responses in a large cohort of CHD patients with and without diabetes.
methodsAnalyses were conducted on 3953 CHD patients [age: 61.1 ± 10.5 years; 741 (18.7%) with diabetes] that completed a representative 12-week CR program. A propensity model was used to match patients with diabetes (n = 731) to those without diabetes (n = 731) on baseline and clinical characteristics.
resultsDiabetic patients experienced smaller improvements in metabolic parameters after completing CR, including abdominal obesity, and lipid profiles (all P ≤ .002), compared to non-diabetic patients. For both groups, there were similar improvement rates in peak metabolic equivalents ([METs]; P < .001); however, peak METs remained lower at 12-weeks in patients with diabetes than without diabetes. At baseline, the combined prevalence of insulin resistance (IR) and diabetes was 57.3%, whereas IR was present in 48.2% of non-diabetic patients, of which rates were reduced to 48.2% and 32.8% after CR, respectively. Accordingly, MetS prevalence decreased from 25.5% to 22.3% in diabetic versus 20.0% to 13.4% in non-diabetic patients (all P ≤ .004).
conclusionsCompleting CR appears to provide comprehensive risk reduction in cardio-metabolic parameters associated with diabetes and MetS; however, CHD patients with diabetes may require additional and more aggressive attention towards all MetS criteria over the course of CR in order to prevent future cardiovascular events.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.