Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31806195›Full record

ArticleValue in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research2019

Trends in the Price per Median and Mean Life-Year Gained Among Newly Approved Cancer Therapies 1995 to 2017.

Alice J Chen, Xiaohan Hu, Rena M Conti, Anupam B Jena, Dana P Goldman

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The Efficiency of the German Healthcare System: Some Puzzling Findings.The International journal of health planning and management · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Alice J ChenSol Price School of Public Policy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; Leonard D. Schaeffer Center for Health Policy and Economics, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA. Electronic address: alicejc@price.usc.edu.
Xiaohan HuLeonard D. Schaeffer Center for Health Policy and Economics, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Rena M ContiQuestrom School of Business, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA.
Anupam B JenaDepartment of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Dana P GoldmanSol Price School of Public Policy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; Leonard D. Schaeffer Center for Health Policy and Economics, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA; National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA, USA.
University of Southern California · USBoston University · USNational Bureau of Economic Research · US

Funding

USC-Yale Roybal Center for Behavioral Interventions in AgingP30AG024968 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI JASON N. DOCTOR · 2004 to 2026
$14.7M
USC Resource Center for Minority Aging Research (US-RCMAR)P30AG043073 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI EMMA AGUILA, JENNIFER A AILSHIRE · 2012 to 2026
$10.1M
AN ECONOMIC AND BEHAVIORAL EVALUATION OF MEDICARE PART DP01AG033559 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI GOLDMAN, DANA P · 2011 to 2015
$3.0M
Physician Determinants of Health Care Spending, Quality, and Patient OutcomesDP5OD017897 · OD · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI JENA, ANUPAM BAPU · 2013 to 2017
$2.1M
NIA NIH HHS P01 AG033559NIA NIH HHS P30 AG024968NIA NIH HHS P30 AG043073NIH HHS DP5 OD017897
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe prices of newly approved cancer drugs have risen over the past decades. A key policy question is whether the clinical gains offered by these drugs in treating specific cancer indications justify the price increases.

objectivesTo evaluate the price per median and mean life year gained among newly approved cancer therapies from 1995 to 2017.

methodsWe collected data on the price (in 2017 USD) per life-year gained among cancer drug-indication pairs approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) between 1995 and 2017. We modeled trends using fractional polynomial and linear spline regression models that controlled for route of administration and cancer type fixed effects.

resultsWe found that between 1995 and 2012, price increases outstripped median survival gains, a finding consistent with previous literature. Nevertheless, price per mean life-year gained increased at a considerably slower rate, suggesting that new drugs have been more effective in achieving longer-term survival. Between 2013 and 2017, price increases reflected equally large gains in median and mean survival, resulting in a flat profile for benefit-adjusted launch prices in recent years.

conclusionsAlthough drug costs have been rising more rapidly than median survival gains, they have been rising at about the same rate as mean survival gains. This suggests that when accounting for longer-term survival gains, the benefits of new drugs are roughly keeping pace with their costs, despite rapid cost growth.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsCost-Benefit AnalysisDisease-Free SurvivalDrug ApprovalDrug CostsFemaleHumansMaleNeoplasmsProgression-Free SurvivalUnited StatesAntineoplastic Agentscancer drugcostmean life-year gainedmedian life-year gainedprice trendssurvival

Identifiers

PMID31806195
PMCPMC7589784
OpenAlexW2975872130

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.