Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31806078›Full record

ArticleOncology research2020

Vinorelbine in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Real-World Data From a Single-Institution Experience.

Stefania Nobili, Daniele Lavacchi, Gabriele Perrone, Giulio Vicini, Renato Tassi, Ida Landini, AnnaMaria Grosso, Giandomenico Roviello, Roberto Mazzanti, Carmine Santomaggio and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncology research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Stefania NobiliSection of Clinical Pharmacology and Oncology, Department of Health Science, University of FlorenceFlorenceItaly.
Daniele LavacchiSchool of Human Health, University of FlorenceFlorenceItaly.
Gabriele PerroneSection of Clinical Pharmacology and Oncology, Department of Health Science, University of FlorenceFlorenceItaly.
Giulio ViciniSchool of Human Health, University of FlorenceFlorenceItaly.
Renato TassiDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of FlorenceFlorenceItaly.
Ida LandiniSection of Clinical Pharmacology and Oncology, Department of Health Science, University of FlorenceFlorenceItaly.
AnnaMaria GrossoUnit of Pneumology and Thoracic-Pulmonary Physiopathology, Careggi University HospitalFlorenceItaly.
Giandomenico RovielloSection of Clinical Pharmacology and Oncology, Department of Health Science, University of FlorenceFlorenceItaly.
Roberto MazzantiDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of FlorenceFlorenceItaly.
Carmine SantomaggioUnit of Translational Oncology, Careggi University HospitalFlorenceItaly.
Enrico MiniSection of Clinical Pharmacology and Oncology, Department of Health Science, University of FlorenceFlorenceItaly.
University of Florence · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of vinorelbine as a single agent or in combination regimens in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is associated with satisfactory clinical activity. However, the role of vinorelbine-based chemotherapy in chemonaive locally advanced unresectable or metastatic NSCLC patients, according to real-world treatment patterns, has still not been widely explored. Eighty-one patients treated at a single institution were retrospectively analyzed. Thirty-seven received standard first-line single-agent vinorelbine, and 44 received vinorelbine plus platinum drugs, based on physician's choice; 61.7% were older than 70 years, and 60.5% were affected by ≥2 comorbidities. Sixty-three patients were evaluable for objective response: 22% achieved partial response and 41% stable disease. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 5.4 months. A benefit in PFS was observed in patients treated with combinations vs. single-agent vinorelbine (6.7 vs. 3.5 months,

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPrognosisRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAntineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicVinorelbine

Identifiers

PMID31806078
PMCPMC7851511
OpenAlexW2993403458

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.