Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31806037›Full record

ArticleImplementation science : IS2019

Action, actor, context, target, time (AACTT): a framework for specifying behaviour.

Justin Presseau, Nicola McCleary, Fabiana Lorencatto, Andrea M Patey, Jeremy M Grimshaw, Jill J Francis

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Implementation science : IS, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05099497 (Big Data and Little Behaviours), which is not on this map. Cited by 191 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
191citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05099497 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Big Data and Little Behaviours: Feedback and Quality Improvement Supports to Primary Care to Facilitate COVID-19 Vaccine Uptake

TypeinterventionalSponsorWomen's College HospitalRan2021 to 2022Enrolled600ConditionsCovid19 Vaccination, Vaccine UptakeArmsUsing Practice Facilitators to Support Physicians
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

191 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Habit Formation to Enhance Implementation of Evidence-based Practice.Administration and policy in mental health · 2026
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

131 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Justin PresseauClinical Epidemiology, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada. jpresseau@ohri.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2132-0703
Nicola McClearyClinical Epidemiology, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada.
Fabiana LorencattoCentre for Behaviour Change, University College London, London, UK.
Andrea M PateyClinical Epidemiology, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada.
Jeremy M GrimshawClinical Epidemiology, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada.
Jill J FrancisSchool of Health Sciences, City University of London, London, UK.

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDesigning implementation interventions to change the behaviour of healthcare providers and other professionals in the health system requires detailed specification of the behaviour(s) targeted for change to ensure alignment between intervention components and measured outcomes. Detailed behaviour specification can help to clarify evidence-practice gaps, clarify who needs to do what differently, identify modifiable barriers and enablers, design interventions to address these and ultimately provides an indicator of what to measure to evaluate an intervention's effect on behaviour change. An existing behaviour specification framework proposes four domains (Target, Action, Context, Time; TACT), but insufficiently clarifies who is performing the behaviour (i.e. the Actor). Specifying the Actor is especially important in healthcare settings characterised by multiple behaviours performed by multiple different people. We propose and describe an extension and re-ordering of TACT to enhance its utility to implementation intervention designers, practitioners and trialists: the Action, Actor, Context, Target, Time (AACTT) framework. We aim to demonstrate its application across key steps of implementation research and to provide tools for its use in practice to clarify the behaviours of stakeholders across multiple levels of the healthcare system. METHODS AND

resultsWe used French et al.'s four-step implementation process model to describe the potential applications of the AACTT framework for (a) clarifying who needs to do what differently, (b) identifying barriers and enablers, (c) selecting fit-for-purpose intervention strategies and components and (d) evaluating implementation interventions.

conclusionsDescribing and detailing behaviour using the AACTT framework may help to enhance measurement of theoretical constructs, inform development of topic guides and questionnaires, enhance the design of implementation interventions and clarify outcome measurement for evaluating implementation interventions.

Indexed as

Quality ImprovementClinical CompetenceGuideline AdherenceHealth PersonnelHealth Plan ImplementationHealth Services ResearchHumansModels, TheoreticalTimeBehaviourBehaviour changeBehaviour specificationFrameworkHealth professional behaviourTACT

Identifiers

PMID31806037
PMCPMC6896730

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.