Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31806005›Full record

SynthesisBMC women's health2019

No straight lines - young women's perceptions of their mental health and wellbeing during and after pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-ethnography.

Grace Lucas, Ellinor K Olander, Susan Ayers, Debra Salmon

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC women's health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Barriers to and facilitators of access to mental health services among pregnant adolescents and young mothers in Belize.Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Grace LucasCentre for Maternal and Child Health Research, School of Health Sciences, City, University of London, Northampton Square, London, EC1V 0HB, UK. grace.lucas@city.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-5941-5233
Ellinor K OlanderCentre for Maternal and Child Health Research, School of Health Sciences, City, University of London, Northampton Square, London, EC1V 0HB, UK.
Susan AyersCentre for Maternal and Child Health Research, School of Health Sciences, City, University of London, Northampton Square, London, EC1V 0HB, UK.
Debra SalmonCentre for Maternal and Child Health Research, School of Health Sciences, City, University of London, Northampton Square, London, EC1V 0HB, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundYoung mothers face mental health challenges during and after pregnancy including increased rates of depression compared to older mothers. While the prevention of teenage pregnancy in countries such as the United States and the United Kingdom has been a focus for policy and research in recent decades, the need to understand young women's own experiences has been highlighted. The aim of this meta-ethnography was to examine young women's perceptions of their mental health and wellbeing during and after pregnancy to provide new understandings of those experiences.

methodsA systematic review and meta-ethnographic synthesis of qualitative research was conducted. Seven databases were systematically searched and forward and backward searching conducted. Papers were included if they were from Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development countries and explored mental health and wellbeing experiences of young mothers (age under 20 in pregnancy; under 25 at time of research) as a primary research question - or where evidence about mental health and wellbeing from participants was foregrounded. Nineteen papers were identified and the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklist for qualitative research used to appraise the evidence. Following the seven-step process of meta-ethnography, key constructs were examined within each study and then translated into one another.

resultsSeven translated themes were identified forming a new line of argument wherein mental health and wellbeing was analysed as relating to individual bodily experiences; tied into past and present relationships; underpinned by economic insecurity and entangled with feelings of societal surveillance. There were 'no straight lines' in young women's experiences, which were more complex than dominant narratives around overcoming adversity suggest.

conclusionsThe synthesis concludes that health and social care professionals need to reflect on the operation of power and stigma in young women's lives and its impact on wellbeing. It adds to understanding of young women's mental health and wellbeing during and after pregnancy as located in physical and structural factors rather than individual capacities alone.

Indexed as

Diagnostic Self EvaluationMental HealthAdolescentAnthropology, CulturalFemaleHumansMental DisordersMothersPregnancyPregnancy in AdolescenceQualitative ResearchUnited KingdomWomen's HealthYoung AdultDepressionMental healthMeta-ethnographyPregnancy in adolescenceSystematic reviewTeenage pregnancyWellbeingYoung mothers

Identifiers

PMID31806005
PMCPMC6896260

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.