Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31805922›Full record

Trial reportBMC oral health2019

Dentin tubule obturation of a bioglass-based dentin desensitizer under repeated exposure to lactid acid and brushing.

Andrea S Manz, Thomas Attin, Beatrice Sener, Philipp Sahrmann

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC oral health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Andrea S ManzClinic of Conservative and Preventive Dentistry Periodontology and Cariology Center of Dental Medicine, University of Zuric, Plattenstr, 11 8032, Zurich, Switzerland.
Thomas AttinClinic of Conservative and Preventive Dentistry Periodontology and Cariology Center of Dental Medicine, University of Zuric, Plattenstr, 11 8032, Zurich, Switzerland.
Beatrice SenerClinic of Conservative and Preventive Dentistry Periodontology and Cariology Center of Dental Medicine, University of Zuric, Plattenstr, 11 8032, Zurich, Switzerland.
Philipp SahrmannClinic of Conservative and Preventive Dentistry Periodontology and Cariology Center of Dental Medicine, University of Zuric, Plattenstr, 11 8032, Zurich, Switzerland. philipp.sahrmann@zzm.uzh.ch.ORCID 0000-0001-5568-2529
University of Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDentin hypersensitivity is a frequent finding especially in periodontitis patients. Conventional treatment aims for obstruction of dentin tubules by disabling liquid and osmotic fluctuation to and from the pulpal chamber. A novel bioglass-based desensitizer was shown to obstruct tubules and to resist periodic exposure to lactic acid. Whether this obstruction is resistant to brushing had not been tested so far. Accordingly, the present study aimed to assess dentin tubule obstruction after repeated acid exposure and brushing.

methodsSixty dentin discs were cleaned with 17% EDTA, mounted into a pulp fluid simulator and randomly divided into 3 groups: No surface treatment in Group A, Seal&Protect® in group B and DentinoCer in group C. Discs were exposed to 0.1 M non-saturated lactic acid thrice and standardized brushing twice a day for 12 days. At baseline and after 2, 4 and 12 d samples were removed from the setting and prepared for top-view SEM analysis to assess tubule obstruction using the Olley score. Discs were then vertically cut and the section surface morphologically assessed using backscatter imaging. For both vertical and sectional surfaces EDX analysis was used to characterize the surface composition in the tubular and inter-tubular area.

resultsGroup A showed clean tubular lumina at all time points. From day 2 onwards dentin showed exposed collagen fibers. Group 2 initially showed a complete surface coverage that flattened out during treatment without ever exposing tubules. At baseline, samples of Group C displayed a complete homogeneous coverage. From day 2 on tubules entrances with obstructed lumen became visible. While on day 4 and 12 the dentin surface exposed collagen fibers the lumina remained closed. EDX analysis of the vertical and horizontal views showed that P and Ca were predominant elements in both the inter- and tubular dentin while Si peaks were found in the tubule plugs.

conclusionWhile group B displayed a packed layer on the surface during the whole investigation time group C samples lost their superficial layer within 48 h. Tubule plugs containing considerable Si proportions indicated previous presence of DentinoCer, while high Ca and P proportions suggest obturation by dentin-like material.

Indexed as

Biocompatible MaterialsCeramicsDentinDentin Desensitizing AgentsDentin PermeabilityDentin SensitivityHumansMicroscopy, Electron, ScanningBiocompatible MaterialsBioglassDentin Desensitizing AgentsBioglassDentin sensitivityDesensitizerElectron microscopyHypersensitivity

Identifiers

PMID31805922
PMCPMC6896668
OpenAlexW2994013566

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.