Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31805917›Full record

ArticleBMC palliative care2019

Paramedic information needs in end-of-life care: a qualitative interview study exploring access to a shared electronic record as a potential solution.

Rebecca Patterson, Holly Standing, Mark Lee, Sonia Dalkin, Monique Lhussier, Catherine Exley, Katie Brittain

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC palliative care, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Rebecca PattersonResearch and Innovation Services, Northumbria University, Pandon Building, Camden Street, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 1XE, UK. becca.patterson@northumbria.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8297-6829
Holly StandingDepartment of Nursing, Midwifery and Health, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Mark LeeSt Benedict's Hospice and Specialist Palliative Care Centre, Sunderland, UK.
Sonia DalkinDepartment of Social Work, Education and Community Wellbeing, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Monique LhussierDepartment of Social Work, Education and Community Wellbeing, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Catherine ExleyFaculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Katie BrittainDepartment of Nursing, Midwifery and Health, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Northumbria University · GBNewcastle University · GBSt Christopher's Hospice · GB

Funding

Connected Health Cities N/AMedical Research Council MR/K02325X/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLimited access to, understanding of, and trust in paper-based patient information is a key factor influencing paramedic decisions to transfer patients nearing end-of-life to hospital. Practical solutions to this problem are rarely examined in research. This paper explores the extent to which access to, and quality of, patient information affects the care paramedics provide to patients nearing end-of-life, and their views on a shared electronic record as a means of accessing up-to-date patient information.

methodSemi-structured interviews with paramedics (n = 10) based in the north of England, drawn from a group of health and social care professionals (n = 61) participating in a study exploring data recording and sharing practices in end-of-life care. Data were analysed using thematic analysis.

resultsTwo key themes were identified regarding paramedic views of patient information: 1) access to information on patients nearing end-of-life, and 2) views on the proposed EPaCCS. Paramedics reported they are typically unable to access up-to-date patient information, particularly advance care planning documents, and consequently often feel they have little option but to actively treat and transport patients to hospital - a decision not always appropriate for, or desired by, the patient. While paramedics acknowledged a shared electronic record (such as EPaCCs) could support them to provide community-based care where desired and appropriate, numerous practical and technical issues must be overcome to ensure the successful implementation of such a record.

conclusionsAccess to up-to-date patient information is a barrier to paramedics delivering appropriate end-of-life care. Current approaches to information recording are often inconsistent, inaccurate, and inaccessible to paramedics. Whilst a shared electronic record may provide paramedics with greater and timelier access to patient information, meaning they are better able to facilitate community-based care, this is only one of a series of improvements required to enable this to become routine practice.

Indexed as

Allied Health PersonnelElectronic Health RecordsEnglandHealth Services AccessibilityHumansInformation DisseminationInterviews as TopicQualitative ResearchTerminal CareAllied health personnelDecision makingEnd-of-lifeInformation technologyParamedic

Identifiers

PMID31805917
PMCPMC6896500
OpenAlexW2993081180

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.