Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31805731›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2019

Genetic Parameters and QTLs for Total Phenolic Content and Yield of Wheat Mapping Population of CSDH Lines under Drought Stress.

Ilona Mieczysława Czyczyło-Mysza, Katarzyna Cyganek, Kinga Dziurka, Steve Quarrie, Edyta Skrzypek, Izabela Marcińska, Beata Myśków, Michał Dziurka, Marzena Warchoł, Kamila Kapłoniak and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Wheat and Barley: Acclimatization to Abiotic and Biotic Stress.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Ilona Mieczysława Czyczyło-MyszaPolish Academy of Sciences, The Franciszek Górski Institute of Plant Physiology, 30-239 Kraków, Niezapominajek 21, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-9586-9272
Katarzyna CyganekPolish Academy of Sciences, The Franciszek Górski Institute of Plant Physiology, 30-239 Kraków, Niezapominajek 21, Poland.
Kinga DziurkaPolish Academy of Sciences, The Franciszek Górski Institute of Plant Physiology, 30-239 Kraków, Niezapominajek 21, Poland.
Steve QuarrieFaculty of Biology, Belgrade University, Studentski trg 16, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia.
Edyta SkrzypekPolish Academy of Sciences, The Franciszek Górski Institute of Plant Physiology, 30-239 Kraków, Niezapominajek 21, Poland.
Izabela MarcińskaPolish Academy of Sciences, The Franciszek Górski Institute of Plant Physiology, 30-239 Kraków, Niezapominajek 21, Poland.
Beata MyśkówDepartment of Plant Genetics, Breeding and Biotechnology, West-Pomeranian University of Technology, Szczecin ul. Słowackiego 17, 71-434 Szczecin, Poland.
Michał DziurkaPolish Academy of Sciences, The Franciszek Górski Institute of Plant Physiology, 30-239 Kraków, Niezapominajek 21, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-8265-6243
Marzena WarchołPolish Academy of Sciences, The Franciszek Górski Institute of Plant Physiology, 30-239 Kraków, Niezapominajek 21, Poland.
Kamila KapłoniakPolish Academy of Sciences, The Franciszek Górski Institute of Plant Physiology, 30-239 Kraków, Niezapominajek 21, Poland.
Jan BocianowskiDepartment of Mathematical and Statistical Methods, Poznań University of Life Sciences, Wojska Polskiego 28, 60-637 Poznań, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-0102-0084
Franciszek Górski Institute of Plant Physiology · PLUniversity of Belgrade · RSUniversity of Life Sciences in Poznań · PLWest Pomeranian University of Technology in Szczecin · PL

Funding

The study was partly financed by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education, Poland (No 479/N-COST-2009/0), statutory investigations in IPP PAS, Kraków, Poland. No 479/N-COST-2009/0
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A doubled haploid population of 94 lines from the Chinese Spring × SQ1 wheat cross (CSDH) was used to evaluate additive and epistatic gene action effects on total phenolic content, grain yield of the main stem, grain number per plant, thousand grain weight, and dry weight per plant at harvest based on phenotypic and genotypic observations of CSDH lines. These traits were evaluated under moderate and severe drought stress and compared with well-watered plants. Plants were grown in pots in an open-sided greenhouse. Genetic parameters, such as additive and epistatic effects, affecting total phenolic content, were estimated for eight year-by-drought combinations. Twenty-one markers showed a significant additive effect on total phenolic content in all eight year-by-drought combinations. These markers were located on chromosomes: 1A, 1B, 2A, 2B, 2D, 3A, 3B, 3D, 4A, and 4D. A region on 4AL with a stable QTL controlling the phenolic content, confirmed by various statistical methods is particularly noteworthy. In all years and treatments, three markers significantly linked to QTLs have been identified for both phenols and yield. Thirteen markers were coincident with candidate genes. Our results indicated the importance of both additive and epistatic gene effects on total phenolic content in eight year-by-drought combinations.

Indexed as

Chromosome MappingQuantitative Trait LociChromosomes, PlantDehydrationEpistasis, GeneticGene Expression Regulation, PlantStress, PhysiologicalTriticumdoubled haploid linesepistasisgenetic mapTriticum aestivumwater deprivation stress

Identifiers

PMID31805731
PMCPMC6929150
OpenAlexW2991026675

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.