Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31805436›Full record

ArticleiScience2019

SAM68-Specific Splicing Is Required for Proper Selection of Alternative 3' UTR Isoforms in the Nervous System.

Yoko Iijima, Masami Tanaka, Satoko Suzuki, David Hauser, Masayuki Tanaka, Chisa Okada, Masatoshi Ito, Noriko Ayukawa, Yuji Sato, Masato Ohtsuka and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iScience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Regionally restricted modulation ofFrontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Yoko IijimaTokai University Institute of Innovative Science and Technology, 143 Shimokasuya, Isehara City, Kanagawa 259-1193, Japan; Department of Molecular Life Science, Division of Basic Medical Science and Molecular Medicine, School of Medicine, Tokai University, 143, Shimokasuya, Isehara, Kanagawa 259-1193, Japan.
Masami TanakaTokai University Institute of Innovative Science and Technology, 143 Shimokasuya, Isehara City, Kanagawa 259-1193, Japan.
Satoko SuzukiTokai University Institute of Innovative Science and Technology, 143 Shimokasuya, Isehara City, Kanagawa 259-1193, Japan.
David HauserBiozentrum, University of Basel, Klingelbergstrasse 50-70, Basel 4056, Switzerland.
Masayuki TanakaThe Support Center for Medical Research and Education, Tokai University, 143 Shimokasuya, Isehara City, Kanagawa 259-1193, Japan.
Chisa OkadaThe Support Center for Medical Research and Education, Tokai University, 143 Shimokasuya, Isehara City, Kanagawa 259-1193, Japan.
Masatoshi ItoThe Support Center for Medical Research and Education, Tokai University, 143 Shimokasuya, Isehara City, Kanagawa 259-1193, Japan.
Noriko AyukawaTokai University Institute of Innovative Science and Technology, 143 Shimokasuya, Isehara City, Kanagawa 259-1193, Japan.
Yuji SatoTokai University Institute of Innovative Science and Technology, 143 Shimokasuya, Isehara City, Kanagawa 259-1193, Japan; Department of Molecular Life Science, Division of Basic Medical Science and Molecular Medicine, School of Medicine, Tokai University, 143, Shimokasuya, Isehara, Kanagawa 259-1193, Japan.
Masato OhtsukaDepartment of Molecular Life Science, Division of Basic Medical Science and Molecular Medicine, School of Medicine, Tokai University, 143, Shimokasuya, Isehara, Kanagawa 259-1193, Japan.
Peter ScheiffeleBiozentrum, University of Basel, Klingelbergstrasse 50-70, Basel 4056, Switzerland.
Takatoshi IijimaTokai University Institute of Innovative Science and Technology, 143 Shimokasuya, Isehara City, Kanagawa 259-1193, Japan; Department of Molecular Life Science, Division of Basic Medical Science and Molecular Medicine, School of Medicine, Tokai University, 143, Shimokasuya, Isehara, Kanagawa 259-1193, Japan. Electronic address: takatoshi.iijima@tokai-u.jp.
Tokai University · JPUniversity of Basel · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuronal alternative splicing is a core mechanism for functional diversification. We previously found that STAR family proteins (SAM68, SLM1, SLM2) regulate spatiotemporal alternative splicing in the nervous system. However, the whole aspect of alternative splicing programs by STARs remains unclear. Here, we performed a transcriptomic analysis using SAM68 knockout and SAM68/SLM1 double-knockout midbrains. We revealed different alternative splicing activity between SAM68 and SLM1; SAM68 preferentially targets alternative 3' UTR exons. SAM68 knockout causes a long-to-short isoform switch of a number of neuronal targets through the alteration in alternative last exon (ALE) selection or alternative polyadenylation. The altered ALE usage of a novel target, interleukin 1 receptor accessory protein (Il1rap), results in remarkable conversion from a membrane-bound type to a secreted type in Sam68

Indexed as

Biological SciencesMolecular BiologyMolecular Mechanism of Gene RegulationMolecular NeuroscienceNeuroscience

Identifiers

PMID31805436
PMCPMC6909182
OpenAlexW2988679995

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.