Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31805311›Full record

Trial reportThe Journal of allergy and clinical immunology2020

Sustained successful peanut oral immunotherapy associated with low basophil activation and peanut-specific IgE.

Mindy Tsai, Kaori Mukai, R Sharon Chinthrajah, Kari C Nadeau, Stephen J Galli

Erratum issuedOpen access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 56 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 114 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Peanut-Specific IgG4 and IgA in Saliva Are Modulated by Peanut Oral Immunotherapy.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice · 2022
    Trial
  4. CD8Nature communications · 2022
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Omalizumab Implementation in Practice: Lessons Learned From the OUtMATCH Study.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice · 2024
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Can artificial intelligence (AI) replace oral food challenge?The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mindy TsaiDepartment of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, Calif; Sean N. Parker Center for Allergy and Asthma Research, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, Calif.
Kaori MukaiDepartment of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, Calif; Sean N. Parker Center for Allergy and Asthma Research, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, Calif.
R Sharon ChinthrajahSean N. Parker Center for Allergy and Asthma Research, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, Calif; Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, Calif.
Kari C NadeauSean N. Parker Center for Allergy and Asthma Research, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, Calif; Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, Calif.
Stephen J GalliDepartment of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, Calif; Sean N. Parker Center for Allergy and Asthma Research, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, Calif; Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, Calif. Electronic address: sgalli@stanford.edu.
Stanford University · US

Funding

Tracking allergen specific T cells in multi-food allergyU19AI104209 · NIAID · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI GALLI, STEPHEN JOSEPH · 2013 to 2025
$17.3M
NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI104209
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOral immunotherapy (OIT) can successfully desensitize many peanut-allergic subjects, but clinical tolerance diminishes over time on discontinuation, or low-dose maintenance, of peanut. Therefore, to improve the efficacy and sustainability of such therapy, we sought to identify biomarkers and clinical tools that can predict therapeutic outcomes and monitor treatment responses.

objectiveWe evaluated whether basophil activation in whole blood, and plasma levels of peanut-specific immunoglobulins, are useful biomarkers for peanut OIT.

methodsWe longitudinally measured, before, during, and after OIT, basophil activation in whole blood ex vivo in response to peanut stimulation, and peanut-specific IgE (sIgE) and peanut-specific IgG

resultsPeanut OIT significantly decreased basophil activation, peanut sIgE, Ara h 1, Ara h 2, and Ara h 3 IgE levels, and sIgE/total IgE, but increased sIgG

conclusionsAssessments of peanut-induced basophil activation and peanut-specific immunoglobulins can help to predict treatment outcomes, and to differentiate transient desensitization versus sustained unresponsiveness after OIT.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAllergensBasophilsBiomarkersDesensitization, ImmunologicDouble-Blind MethodHumansImmunoglobulin EPeanut HypersensitivityAllergensBiomarkersImmunoglobulin EBasophilbasophil activation testbiomarkersCD203cCD63oral immunotherapypeanut allergypeanut-specific IgEpeanut-specific IgG(4)

Identifiers

PMID31805311
PMCPMC6957313
OpenAlexW2989717069

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.