ArticlePloS one2019
Genetic and morphological divergence in the warm-water planktonic foraminifera genus Globigerinoides.
Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Unravelling Evolutionary and Ecological Insights of Foraminifera by Using Next Generation Sequencing: A Review.Biochemical genetics · 2026Review
- Detecting environmentally dependent developmental plasticity in fossilized individuals.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Exploring the potential of the COI gene marker for DNA barcoding of planktonic foraminifera.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Two waves of photosymbiosis acquisition in extant planktonic foraminifera explained by ecological incumbency.The ISME journal · 2025Article
- Correction: Genetic and morphological divergence in the warm-water planktonic foraminifera genus Globigerinoides.PloS one · 2025Article
- ForCenS-LGM: a dataset of planktonic foraminifera species assemblage composition for the Last Glacial Maximum.Scientific data · 2024Article
- Collection of X-ray micro computed tomography images of shells of planktic foraminifera with curated taxonomy.Scientific data · 2023Article
- The FORCIS database: A global census of planktonic Foraminifera from ocean waters.Scientific data · 2023Article
- Renewal of planktonic foraminifera diversity after the Cretaceous Paleogene mass extinction by benthic colonizers.Nature communications · 2022Article
- Adaptive ecological niche migration does not negate extinction susceptibility.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Article
- Coiling directions in the planktonic foraminifer Pulleniatina: A complex eco-evolutionary dynamic spanning millions of years.PloS one · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The planktonic foraminifera genus Globigerinoides provides a prime example of a species-rich genus in which genetic and morphological divergence are uncorrelated. To shed light on the evolutionary processes that lead to the present-day diversity of Globigerinoides, we investigated the genetic, ecological and morphological divergence of its constituent species. We assembled a global collection of single-cell barcode sequences and show that the genus consists of eight distinct genetic types organized in five extant morphospecies. Based on morphological evidence, we reassign the species Globoturborotalita tenella to Globigerinoides and amend Globigerinoides ruber by formally proposing two new subspecies, G. ruber albus n.subsp. and G. ruber ruber in order to express their subspecies level distinction and to replace the informal G. ruber "white" and G. ruber "pink", respectively. The genetic types within G. ruber and Globigerinoides elongatus show a combination of endemism and coexistence, with little evidence for ecological differentiation. CT-scanning and ontogeny analysis reveal that the diagnostic differences in adult morphologies could be explained by alterations of the ontogenetic trajectories towards final (reproductive) size. This indicates that heterochrony may have caused the observed decoupling between genetic and morphological diversification within the genus. We find little evidence for environmental forcing of either the genetic or the morphological diversification, which allude to biotic interactions such as symbiosis, as the driver of speciation in Globigerinoides.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.