Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31805129›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

In vivo ultrasound thermal ablation control using echo decorrelation imaging in rabbit liver and VX2 tumor.

Mohamed A Abbass, Syed A Ahmad, Neeraja Mahalingam, K Sameer Krothapalli, Jack A Masterson, Marepalli B Rao, Peter G Barthe, T Douglas Mast

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Numerical analysis of three-dimensional echo decorrelation imaging.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mohamed A AbbassDept of Biomedical Engineering, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-4879-5917
Syed A AhmadDept of Surgery, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States of America.
Neeraja MahalingamDept of Biomedical Engineering, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States of America.
K Sameer KrothapalliDept of Biomedical Engineering, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States of America.
Jack A MastersonDept of Biomedical Engineering, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States of America.
Marepalli B RaoDept of Biomedical Engineering, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States of America.
Peter G BartheGuided Therapy Systems/Ardent Sound, Mesa, Arizona, United States of America.
T Douglas MastDept of Biomedical Engineering, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-5963-7335
University of Cincinnati · USGuided Therapy Systems (United States) · US

Funding

Real-time prediction of thermal ablation-induced cell death by echo decorrelationR01CA158439 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI · PI MAST, T DOUGLAS · 2012 to 2022
$3.4M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA158439
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The utility of echo decorrelation imaging feedback for real-time control of in vivo ultrasound thermal ablation was assessed in rabbit liver with VX2 tumor. High-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) and unfocused (bulk) ablation were performed using 5 MHz linear image-ablate arrays. Treatments comprised up to nine lower-power sonications, followed by up to nine higher-power sonications, ceasing when the average cumulative echo decorrelation within a control region of interest exceeded a predefined threshold (- 2.3, log10-scaled echo decorrelation per millisecond, corresponding to 90% specificity for tumor ablation prediction in previous in vivo experiments). This threshold was exceeded in all cases for both HIFU (N = 12) and bulk (N = 8) ablation. Controlled HIFU trials achieved a significantly higher average ablation rate compared to comparable ablation trials without image-based control, reported previously. Both controlled HIFU and bulk ablation trials required significantly less treatment time than these previous uncontrolled trials. Prediction of local liver and VX2 tumor ablation using echo decorrelation was tested using receiver operator characteristic curve analysis, showing prediction capability statistically equivalent to uncontrolled trials. Compared to uncontrolled trials, controlled trials resulted in smaller thermal ablation regions and higher contrast between echo decorrelation in treated vs. untreated regions. These results indicate that control using echo decorrelation imaging may reduce treatment duration and increase treatment reliability for in vivo thermal ablation.

Indexed as

AnimalsFeasibility StudiesHigh-Intensity Focused Ultrasound AblationLiver NeoplasmsRabbitsReproducibility of ResultsSurgery, Computer-AssistedUltrasonography

Identifiers

PMID31805129
PMCPMC6894854
OpenAlexW2991954278

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.