ArticleAIDS (London, England)2019
HIV surveillance based on routine testing data from antenatal clinics in Malawi (2011-2018): measuring and adjusting for bias from imperfect testing coverage.
Article in AIDS (London, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Triangulation of Routine Antenatal HIV Prevalence Data and Adjusted HIV Estimates in Mozambique.Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999) · 2024Article
- Prevalence and incidence of transfusion-transmissible infections among blood donors in Malawi: A population-level study.Transfusion medicine (Oxford, England) · 2023Article
- Preferences for enhanced treatment options to address HIV care engagement among women living with HIV and perinatal depression in Malawi.BMC public health · 2023Article
- Article
- Interpreting declines in HIV test positivity: an analysis of routine data from Zimbabwe's national sex work programme, 2009-2019.Journal of the International AIDS Society · 2022Article
- Summarizing the results and methods of the 2019 Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS HIV estimates.AIDS (London, England) · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThe use of routinely collected data from prevention of mother-to-child transmission programs (ANC-RT) has been proposed to monitor HIV epidemic trends. This poses several challenges for surveillance, one of them being that women may opt-out of testing and/or test stock-outs may result in inconsistent service availability. In this study, we sought to empirically quantify the relationship between imperfect HIV testing coverage and HIV prevalence among pregnant women from ANC-RT data.
designWe used reports from the ANC Register of all antenatal care (ANC) sites in Malawi (2011-2018), including 49 244 monthly observations, from 764 facilities, totaling 4 375 777 women.
methodsBinomial logistic regression models with facility-level fixed effects and marginal standardization were used to assess the effect of testing coverage on HIV prevalence.
resultsTesting coverage increased from 78 to 98% over 2011-2018. We estimated that, had testing coverage been perfect, prevalence would have been 0.4% point lower (95% CI 0.3-0.5%) than the 7.9% observed prevalence, a relative overestimation of 6%. Bias in HIV prevalence was the highest in 2012, when testing coverage was lowest (72%), resulting in a relative overestimation of HIV prevalence of 15% (95% CI 12-17%). Overall, adjustments for imperfect testing coverage led to a subtler decline in HIV prevalence over 2011--2018.
conclusionMalawi achieved high coverage of routine HIV testing in recent years. Nevertheless, imperfect testing coverage can lead to overestimation of HIV prevalence among pregnant women when coverage is suboptimal. ANC-RT data should be carefully evaluated for changes in testing coverage and completeness when used to monitor epidemic trends.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.