Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31804926›Full record

ArticleIEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering2020

Design and Integration of a Parallel, Soft Robotic End-Effector for Extracorporeal Ultrasound.

Lukas Lindenroth, Richard James Housden, Shuangyi Wang, Junghwan Back, Kawal Rhode, Hongbin Liu

Erratum issuedOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Toward Development of Novel Remote Ultrasound Robotic System Using Soft Robotics Technology.Journal of engineering and science in medical diagnostics and therapy · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lukas Lindenroth
Richard James Housden
Shuangyi Wang
Junghwan Back
Kawal Rhode
Hongbin Liu
King's College London · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust 102431
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveIn this work we address limitations in state-of-the-art ultrasound robots by designing and integrating a novel soft robotic system for ultrasound imaging. It employs the inherent qualities of soft fluidic actuators to establish safe, adaptable interaction between ultrasound probe and patient.

methodsWe acquire clinical data to determine the movement ranges and force levels required in prenatal foetal ultrasound imaging and design the soft robotic end-effector accordingly. We verify its mechanical characteristics, derive and validate a kinetostatic model and demonstrate controllability and imaging capabilities on an ultrasound phantom.

resultsThe soft robot exhibits the desired stiffness characteristics and is able to reach 100% of the required workspace when no external force is present, and 95% of the workspace when considering its compliance. The model can accurately predict the end-effector pose with a mean error of 1.18±0.29 mm in position and 0.92±0.47

conclusionThe system is able to withstand loads commonly applied during foetal ultrasound scans and remains controllable with a motion range similar to manual scanning. SIGNIFICANCE: The proposed soft robot presents a safe, cost-effective solution to offloading sonographers in day-to-day scanning routines. The design and modelling paradigms are greatly generalizable and particularly suitable for designing soft robots for physical interaction tasks.

Indexed as

RoboticsEquipment DesignHumansMotionPhantoms, ImagingUltrasonography

Identifiers

PMID31804926
PMCPMC7115900
OpenAlexW2993611986

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.