Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31804732›Full record

Trial reportTransfusion2020

Red blood cell transfusion results in adhesion of neutrophils in human endotoxemia and in critically ill patients with sepsis.

Maike E van Hezel, Margit Boshuizen, Anna L Peters, M Straat, Alexander P Vlaar, Angelique M E Spoelstra-de Man, Michael W T Tanck, Anton T J Tool, Boukje M Beuger, Taco W Kuijpers and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Transfusion, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 51% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The Red-cell Transfusion Strategy Dilemma in Critically Ill Patients in ICU: Is Restrictive or Liberal the Answer?Acta informatica medica : AIM : journal of the Society for Medical Informatics of Bosnia & Herzegovina : casopis Drustva za medicinsku informatiku BiH · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Maike E van HezelDepartment of Blood Cell Research, Sanquin Research and Landsteiner Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0502-0820
Margit BoshuizenDepartment of Blood Cell Research, Sanquin Research and Landsteiner Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2019-9147
Anna L PetersDepartment of Anesthesiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
M StraatDepartment of Blood Cell Research, Sanquin Research and Landsteiner Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Alexander P VlaarDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine and Laboratory of Experimental Intensive Care and Anesthesiology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Angelique M E Spoelstra-de ManDepartment of Intensive Care, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Michael W T TanckDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Bioinformatics (KEBB), Academic Medical Center of the University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Anton T J ToolDepartment of Blood Cell Research, Sanquin Research and Landsteiner Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Boukje M BeugerDepartment of Blood Cell Research, Sanquin Research and Landsteiner Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Taco W KuijpersDepartment of Blood Cell Research, Sanquin Research and Landsteiner Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Nicole P JuffermansDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine and Laboratory of Experimental Intensive Care and Anesthesiology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Robin van BruggenDepartment of Blood Cell Research, Sanquin Research and Landsteiner Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Sanquin · NLAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NLAmsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam · NLUtrecht University · NL

Funding

Ministerie van Volksgezondheid, Welzijn en Sport grant PPOC-13-018
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRed blood cell (RBC) transfusion is associated with adverse effects, which may involve activation of the host immune response. The effect of RBC transfusion on neutrophil Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) production and adhesion ex vivo was investigated in endotoxemic volunteers and in critically ill patients that received a RBC transfusion. We hypothesized that RBC transfusion would cause neutrophil activation, the extent of which depends on the storage time and the inflammatory status of the recipient. STUDY DESIGN AND

methodsVolunteers were injected with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and transfused with either saline, fresh, or stored autologous RBCs. In addition, 47 critically ill patients with and without sepsis receiving either fresh (<8 days) or standard stored RBC (2-35 days) were included. Neutrophils from healthy volunteers were incubated with the plasma samples from the endotoxemic volunteers and from the critically ill patients, after which priming of neutrophil ROS production and adhesion were assessed.

resultsIn the endotoxemia model, ex vivo neutrophil adhesion, but not ROS production, was increased after transfusion, which was not affected by RBC storage duration. In the critically ill, ex vivo neutrophil ROS production was already increased prior to transfusion and was not increased following transfusion. Neutrophil adhesion was increased following transfusion, which was more notable in the septic patients than in non-septic patients. Transfusion of fresh RBCs, but not standard issued RBCs, resulted in enhanced ROS production in neutrophils.

conclusionRBC transfusion was associated with increased neutrophil adhesion in a model of human endotoxemia as well as in critically ill patients with sepsis.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultCell AdhesionCells, CulturedCritical IllnessEndotoxemiaErythrocyte TransfusionHealthy VolunteersHumansMaleNeutrophilsReactive Oxygen SpeciesSepsisYoung AdultReactive Oxygen Species

Identifiers

PMID31804732
PMCPMC7028139
OpenAlexW2991726162

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.