ArticleBioscience reports2019
Mismatch repair status between primary colorectal tumor and metastatic tumor, a retrospective consistent study.
Article in Bioscience reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of immunohistochemistry, PCR, and NGS for the evaluation of mismatch repair deficiency and microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer: a retrospective study.Diagnostic pathology · 2026Article
- Immunotherapy-induced microsatellite instability status shift in recurrent perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: A case report.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2025Article
- Cutaneous Metastasis of Rectal Cancer as a Diagnostic Challenge: A Clinical Case and Literature Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Head-to-head comparative study: evaluating three panels for MSI-PCR testing in patients with colorectal and gastric cancer.Journal of clinical pathology · 2024Article
- Comparison of PD-L1 expression and MMR status between primary and matched metastatic lesions in patients with cervical cancer.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023Article
- Site of analysis matters - Ongoing complete response to Nivolumab in a patient with HIV/HPV related metastatic anal cancer andOncotarget · 2022Article
- Recommendations for Specimen and Therapy Selection in Colorectal Cancer.Oncology and therapy · 2021Article
- Perspectives on Immunotherapy of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Review
- Incidence and detection of high microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer in a Chinese population: a meta-analysis.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives Mismatch repair (MMR) and Microsatellite instability (MSI) are critical when considering immunotherapy and chemotherapeutic drugs an option for patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). We investigated the consistence of MMR status as well as MSI between primary CRC and metastatic tumor to see if the expression of four MMR proteins and the status of MSI are congruent in primary tumor and metastatic tumor. With the results of the study and future more relevant studies, the sites of MMR testing may be more precise for individualized treatment. Study design Patients with clear diagnosis of sporadic CRC and distal organ metastasis were identified from a prospectively established database. The status of MMR and MSI was evaluated by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) respectively of synchronously obtained tissue samples. Results Forty patients with complete clinical date were enrolled. For primary tumor, 36/40 samples were tested as MMR-proficient (pMMR) and 4 were MMR-deficient (dMMR). For metastatic samples, 30 samples were tested as pMMR while 10 samples were dMMR. Six out of forty patients were tested as inconsistent status of MMR and MSI. After statistical analysis, the expression status of MMR was not statistically significant between primary and metastatic tumors (P=0.1405, larger than 0.05). Conclusion Based on our samples, the status of MMR between primary CRC and metastatic tumor was consistent, thus test of MMR status can be performed at both sites. However, due to the limited samples enrolled in our study, the results should be interpreted carefully.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.