Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31804615›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Neuroscience2020

The m

Ido Livneh, Sharon Moshitch-Moshkovitz, Ninette Amariglio, Gideon Rechavi, Dan Dominissini

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Neuroscience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 205 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
205citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

205 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Optimized GLORI-Seq of Chromatin-Associated RNAs.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2027
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. The mMolecular psychiatry · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Bridging maternal effects and epitranscriptomics: A novel perspective in developmental biology.Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists · 2026
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The Role of NMedComm · 2026
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

145 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ido LivnehTechnion Integrated Cancer Center, The Rappaport Faculty of Medicine and Research Institute, Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5530-7964
Sharon Moshitch-MoshkovitzSackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Ninette AmariglioCancer Research Center, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel HaShomer, Israel.
Gideon RechaviSackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Dan DominissiniSackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel. dan.dominissini@sheba.health.gov.il.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1121-5130

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The field of epitranscriptomics examines the recently deciphered form of gene expression regulation that is mediated by type- and site-specific RNA modifications. Similarly to the role played by epigenetic mechanisms - which operate via DNA and histone modifications - epitranscriptomic modifications are involved in the control of the delicate gene expression patterns that are needed for the development and activity of the nervous system and are essential for basic and higher brain functions. Here we describe the mechanisms that are involved in the writing, erasing and reading of N

Indexed as

Gene Expression RegulationTranscriptomeAdenosineAnimalsAxon GuidanceBrainEpigenesis, GeneticHumansNeurogenesisNeurogliaRNA, MessengerAdenosineN-methyladenosineRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.