ArticleScientific reports2019
Rapid identification of respiratory bacterial pathogens from bronchoalveolar lavage fluid in cattle by MALDI-TOF MS.
Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- A case series of 21 adult cows with acute infectious bronchopneumonia: clinical, laboratory, and thoracic ultrasonographic findings.Journal of veterinary internal medicine · 2026Article
- Investigating bronchoalveolar lavage fluid cytology in relation to pathogen identification and consolidation depth in calves.Journal of veterinary internal medicine · 2026Article
- Accuracy of two Sepsityper MALDI-TOF MS methods for bacterial identification in bloodstream infections in dogs, foals, and calves using Bayesian latent class model.The veterinary quarterly · 2025Article
- From Identification to Insight: Making Full Use of the Diagnostic Potential of MS/MS Proteotyping in Clinical Microbiology Using Efficient Bioinformatics.Journal of proteome research · 2025Review
- Shotgun Metagenomic Sequencing Analysis as a Diagnostic Strategy for Patients with Lower Respiratory Tract Infections.Microorganisms · 2025Article
- Exploring the diagnostic landscape ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2025Review
- Towards harmonized laboratory methodologies in veterinary clinical bacteriology: outcomes of a European survey.Frontiers in microbiology · 2024Article
- Effect of age, season, and gender on bronchoalveolar lavage fluid cytology in camels.Open veterinary journal · 2023Article
- Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time-of-flight mass spectrometry in veterinary medicine: Recent advances (2019-present).Veterinary world · 2022Review
- Bovine respiratory microbiota of feedlot cattle and its association with disease.Veterinary research · 2022Review
- Differentiation of GastricPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Storage time and temperature affect the isolation rate of Mannheimia haemolytica and Pasteurella multocida from bovine bronchoalveolar lavage samples.BMC veterinary research · 2020Article
- Bovine Respiratory Disease Diagnosis: What Progress Has Been Made in Infectious Diagnosis?The Veterinary clinics of North America. Food animal practice · 2020Review
- Rapid Identification of Mycoplasma bovis Strains from Bovine Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid with Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization-Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry after Enrichment Procedure.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2020Article
- Thoracic Ultrasonography in Calves: A Narrative Review of Techniques and Reporting Practices.Journal of veterinary internal medicineReview
- Association of Lung Consolidation Depth With Pathogens Isolated From Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid in Calves With Clinical Signs of Respiratory Disease.Journal of veterinary internal medicineArticle
- Differentiating airway inflammation in calves based on cluster analysis of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid cytology.Journal of veterinary internal medicineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Respiratory tract infections are a major health problem and indication for antimicrobial use in cattle and in humans. Currently, most antimicrobial treatments are initiated without microbiological results, holding the risk of inappropriate first intention treatment. The main reason for this empirical treatment is the long turnaround time between sampling and availability of identification and susceptibility results. Therefore the objective of the present study was to develop a rapid identification procedure for pathogenic respiratory bacteria in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALf) samples from cattle by MALDI-TOF MS, omitting the cultivation step on agar plates to reduce the turnaround time between sampling and identification of pathogens. The effects of two different liquid growth media and various concentrations of bacitracin were determined to allow optimal growth of Pasteurellaceae and minimise contamination. The best procedure was validated on 100 clinical BALf samples from cattle with conventional bacterial culture as reference test. A correct identification was obtained in 73% of the samples, with 59.1% sensitivity (Se) (47.2-71.0%) and 100% specificity (Sp) (100-100%) after only 6 hours of incubation. For pure and dominant culture samples, the procedure was able to correctly identify 79.2% of the pathogens, with a sensitivity (Se) of 60.5% (45.0-76.1%) and specificity (Sp) of 100% (100-100%). In mixed culture samples, containing ≥2 clinically relevant pathogens, one pathogen could be correctly identified in 57% of the samples with 57.1% Se (38.8-75.5%) and 100% Sp (100-100%). In conclusion, MALDI-TOF MS is a promising tool for rapid pathogen identification in BALf. This new technique drastically reduces turnaround time and may be a valuable decision support tool to rationalize antimicrobial use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.