ArticleScientific reports2019
A low-cost 2-D video system can accurately and reliably assess adaptive gait kinematics in healthy and low vision subjects.
Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Decoding free-throw accuracy: a 2D biomechanical comparison of shooting mechanics in athletes and novice basketball players.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2026Article
- A Comprehensive Review of Vision-Based Sensor Systems for Human Gait Analysis.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Head Rotation Impairs Balance and Walking in People With Mild to Moderate Multiple Sclerosis: A Pilot Study.International journal of MS care · 2025Article
- Decoding lower-limb kinematic parameters during pedaling tasks using deep learning approaches and EEG.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2024Article
- Establishing the Reliability of the GaitONSensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Impact of Peripheral Refractive Errors in Mobility Performance.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2024Article
- Increased Barefoot Stride Variability Might Be Predictor Rather than Risk Factor for Overuse Injury in the Military.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- Accuracy and Precision of a Novel Photogate System to Measure Toe Clearance on Stairs.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- A Cross-Sectional Study on Fall Direction and Lower Limb Loading in Response to a Perturbation on Laterally Inclined Platform.Applied bionics and biomechanics · 2023Article
- An evaluation of temporal and club angle parameters during golf swings using low cost video analyses packages.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Mechanisms of neuro-robotic prosthesis operation in leg amputees.Science advances · 2021Article
- Kinematic Analysis of Water Polo Player in the Vertical Thrust Performance to Determine the Force-Velocity and Power-Velocity Relationships in Water: A Preliminary Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
3-D gait analysis is the gold standard but many healthcare clinics and research institutes would benefit from a system that is inexpensive and simple but just as accurate. The present study examines whether a low-cost 2-D motion capture system can accurately and reliably assess adaptive gait kinematics in subjects with central vision loss, older controls, and younger controls. Subjects were requested to walk up and step over a 10 cm high obstacle that was positioned in the middle of a 4.5 m walkway. Four trials were simultaneously recorded with the Vicon motion capture system (3-D system) and a video camera that was positioned perpendicular to the obstacle (2-D system). The kinematic parameters (crossing height, crossing velocity, foot placement, single support time) were calculated offline. Strong Pearson's correlations were found between the two systems for all parameters (average r = 0.944, all p < 0.001). Bland-Altman analysis showed that the agreement between the two systems was good in all three groups after correcting for systematic biases related to the 2-D marker positions. The test-retest reliability for both systems was high (average ICC = 0.959). These results show that a low-cost 2-D video system can reliably and accurately assess adaptive gait kinematics in healthy and low vision subjects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.