ArticleCell death & disease2019
Correction: Cardiomyocyte-specific disruption of Cathepsin K protects against doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity.
Article in Cell death & disease, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reply to Trela, B.A.; Guffroy, M.R. Comment on "AlAsmari et al. Venetoclax Induces Cardiotoxicity Through Modulation of Oxidative-Stress-Mediated Cardiac Inflammation and Apoptosis via NF-κB and BCL-2 Pathway.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Cathepsin K inhibition promotes efficient differentiation of human embryonic stem cells to mature cardiomyocytes by mediating glucolipid metabolism and cellular energy homeostasis.Stem cell research & therapy · 2025Article
- Identification and Analysis of Hub Genes in Diabetic Cardiomyopathy: Potential Role of Cytochrome P450 1A1 in Mitochondrial Metabolism and STZ-Induced Myocardial Dysfunction.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Article
- Shenlijia Attenuates Doxorubicin-Induced Chronic Heart Failure by Inhibiting Cardiac Fibrosis.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum for
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
An amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via a link at the top of the paper.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.