Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31804434›Full record

ArticleNursing research

Two Methods for Calculating Symptom Cluster Scores.

Rebecca E Salomon, Jamie Crandell, Keely A Muscatell, Hudson P Santos, Ruth A Anderson, Linda S Beeber

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rebecca E SalomonRebecca E. Salomon, PhD, RN, PMHNP-BC, is Postdoctoral Fellow, University of California San Francisco School of Nursing. At the time this research was completed, she was a Predoctoral Trainee at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Nursing. Jamie Crandell, PhD, is Research Assistant Professor, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Nursing and Department of Biostatistics, Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. Keely A. Muscatell, PhD, is Assistant Professor, Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, College of Arts and Sciences, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, with a dual appointment at the Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. Hudson P. Santos, Jr., PhD, RN, is Assistant Professor; Ruth A. Anderson, PhD, RN, FAAN, is the Kenan Distinguished Professor and Associate Dean for Research; and Linda S. Beeber, PhD, PMHCNS-BC, FAAN, is Professor and Assistant Dean, PhD Division and PhD Program, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Nursing.
Jamie Crandell
Keely A Muscatell
Hudson P Santos
Ruth A Anderson
Linda S Beeber

Funding

INTERVENTIONS FOR PREVENTING &MANAGING CHRONIC ILLNESST32NR007091 · NINR · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Cheryl L Giscombe, Cathi Barbra Propper · 1996 to 2026
$11.8M
Biobehavioral Research Training Program in Symptom ScienceT32NR016920 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI MIASKOWSKI, CHRISTINE A., WEISS, SANDRA JEAN · 2017 to 2021
$2.4M
Psychoneurological Symptoms in Situationally Stressed Low Income MothersF31NR017106 · NINR · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI SALOMON, REBECCA · 2017 to 2018
$69k
NINR NIH HHS F31 NR017106NINR NIH HHS T32 NR007091NINR NIH HHS T32 NR016920
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSymptom clusters are conventionally distilled into a single score using composite scoring, which is based on the mathematical assumption that all symptoms are equivalently related to outcomes of interest; this may lead to a loss of important variation in the data.

objectivesThis article compares two ways of calculating a single score for a symptom cluster: a conventional, hypothesis-driven composite score versus a data-driven, reduced rank regression score that weights the symptoms based on their individual relationships with key outcomes.

methodsWe conducted a secondary analysis of psychoneurological symptoms from a sample of 356 low-income mothers. Four of the psychoneurological symptoms (fatigue, cognitive dysfunction, sleep disturbance, and depressed mood) were measured with the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale; the fifth (pain) was measured using an item from the Medical Outcomes Study 12-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12). Mothers' function was measured using the 12-item Short Form Health Survey. The composite score was calculated by summing standardized scores for each individual psychoneurological symptom. In contrast, reduced rank regression weighted the individual symptoms using their respective associations with mothers' function; the weighted individual symptom scores were summed into the reduced rank regression symptom score.

resultsThe composite score and reduced rank regression score were highly correlated at .93. The cluster of psychoneurological symptoms accounted for 53.7% of the variation in the mothers' function. Depressed mood and pain accounted for almost all the explained variation in mothers' function at 37.2% and 15.0%, respectively. DISCUSSION: The composite score approach was simpler to calculate, and the high correlation with the reduced rank regression score indicates that the composite score reflected most of the variation explained by the reduced rank regression approach in this data set. However, the reduced rank regression analysis provided additional information by identifying pain and depressed mood as having the strongest association with a mother's function, which has implications for understanding which symptoms to target in future interventions. Future studies should also explore composite versus reduced rank regression approaches given that reduced rank regression may yield different insights in other data sets.

Indexed as

Cognitive DysfunctionFatigueModels, StatisticalBrief Psychiatric Rating ScaleDepressionFemaleHumansMiddle AgedMothersPainPovertyQuality of LifeSleep Wake DisordersSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID31804434
PMCPMC7050366

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.