Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31804433›Full record

ArticleNursing research

Recruitment Strategies for Nurse Enrollment in an Online Study.

Jessica Surdam, Barbara Daly, Sarah Fulton, Seunghee Margevicius, Mark Schluchter, Susan Flocke, Sharon Manne, Neal J Meropol

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jessica SurdamJessica Surdam, MPH, is Research Project Director, Frances Payne Bolton School of Nursing, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio. Barbara Daly, PhD, RN, FAAN, is Professor, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio. Sarah Fulton, MA, is Research Operations Manager, Frances Payne Bolton School of Nursing, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio. Seunghee Margevicius, PhD, is Research Associate, Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio. Mark Schluchter, PhD, is Professor, Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio. Susan Flocke, PhD, is Professor of Family Medicine, School of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Ohio. Sharon Manne, PhD, is Professor, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers, State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick. Neal J. Meropol, MD, is Vice President, Research Oncology, Flatiron Health, New York, New York, and Adjunct Professor, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio.
Barbara Daly
Sarah Fulton
Seunghee Margevicius
Mark Schluchter
Susan Flocke
Sharon Manne
Neal J Meropol

Funding

Oncology Nurse IMPACT:Improving Communication with Patients about Clinical TrialR25CA177574 · NCI · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI DALY, BARBARA · 2014 to 2018
$1.4M
NCI NIH HHS R25 CA177574
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough there is a great deal of literature regarding effective recruitment and challenges of recruiting specific patient populations, there is less known about best practices for recruitment of nurses as study subjects.

objectivesThe purpose of this article is to report our experience with recruitment and retention for a randomized trial of an online educational program to prepare oncology nurses to discuss oncology clinical trials with patients.

methodsThe study population included currently employed oncology nurses with direct patient interaction. There were three phases of this study: (1) qualitative interviews, (2) a pilot test, and (3) the randomized trial. Phase 3 was rolled out in five waves of recruitment. The distinct phases of the study-and the gradual roll out of recruitment during Phase 3-allowed us to test and refine our recruitment and retention methods for the randomized trial. Upon analysis of our response rate and attrition after the first wave of recruitment in Phase 3, we made several changes to improve recruitment and retention, including adding incentives, shortening the survey, and increasing the number of reminders to complete the program.

resultsThe response rate was higher when we used both e-mail and U.S. postal mail solicitations. After the first wave of recruitment in the final phase, changes in our strategies did not increase our overall response rate significantly; however, the rate of attrition following baseline declined. DISCUSSION: Recruitment planning is an important component of successful clinical research. The use of the Internet for both recruitment of subjects and testing of interventions remains a cost-effective and potentially high yield methodology. Our research demonstrated several successful approaches to yield increased participation and retention of subjects, including seeking formal relationships with professional organizations as sponsors or supporters, providing meaningful incentives to participants, keeping surveys or questionnaires as short as possible, and planning multiple follow-up contacts from the outset.

Indexed as

InternetPatient SelectionAdultBiomedical ResearchClinical Trials as TopicFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNursing StaffOncology NursingResearch DesignSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited States

Identifiers

PMID31804433
PMCPMC6911026

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.